02-tests Release 2015.12 - RC4

Release 2015.12 - RC2

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 2 of the 2015.12 release.

Specs tested:

02-tests/task 03 Release 2016.07 - RC1

Task # 03

Perform a subset of tests (!= subset from Task #02) on `samr21-xpro` node:

bitarithm_timings
bloom_bytes
coap
conn_ip
cpp11_condition_variable
cpp11_mutex
cpp11_thread
driver_adt7310 -> results in expected behaviour: Initializing ADT7310 sensor... [Failed]*
driver_at30tse75x
driver_at86rf2xx
driver_bh1750 -> results in expected behaviour: the lux value is always 0, since no BH1750FVI ambient light sensor is attached
driver_bmp180
driver_dht
driver_enc28j60 -> results in expected behaviour: ifconfig doesn't show up the ethernet device since its not attached
driver_encx24j600
driver_hdc1000
driver_hih6130 -> results in expected behaviour: Initializing HIH6130 sensor at I2C_0, address 0x27... [OK] Communication error: -1, since no HIH6130 sensor is attached
driver_ina220
driver_isl29020
driver_isl29125 -> results in expected behaviour: Initializing ISL29125 sensor at I2C_0... [Failed]
driver_kw2xrf
driver_l3g4200d
driver_lis3dh -> results in expected behaviour: Initializing LIS3DH sensor... [Failed]
driver_lis3mdl
driver_lps331ap
driver_lsm303dlhc -> results in expected behaviour: Initializing LSM303DLHC sensor at I2C_0... [Failed]
driver_mag3110
driver_mma8652
driver_mpl3115a2 -> results in expected behaviour: Initializing MPL3115A2 sensor at I2C_0... [Failed]
driver_mpu9150
driver_mq3
driver_nrf24l01p_lowlevel -> results in expected behaviour: initializing the transceiver it fails with all read registers are 0
driver_nrfmin
driver_nvram_spi
driver_pcd8544 -> runs but doesn't give feedback if a display is actually attached
driver_pir
driver_servo
driver_si70xx -> results in expected behaviour: Testing sensor communication...[Failed], since no SI7021 temperature and humidity sensor is attached
driver_srf02
driver_srf08
driver_tcs37727 -> results in expected behaviour: Initializing TCS37727 sensor at I2C_0... [Failed], since its not attached
driver_tmp006
driver_xbee
emb6
fault_handler
float
fmt_print
gnrc_ipv6_ext
gnrc_sixlowpan
irq
leds
libfixmath
lwip
malloc
minimal
msg_send_receive (fixed: RIOT-OS/RIOT#5701)
msg_try_receive
mutex_order
mutex_unlock_and_sleep
netdev2_test
netstats_l2
nhdp
periph_adc
periph_cpuid
periph_dac
periph_gpio
periph_hwrng
periph_i2c -> initialization of the i2c works
periph_pwm
periph_rtc
periph_rtt
periph_spi
periph_timer
periph_uart -> initialized UART device 1 with a 9800 baudrate
pipe
pkg_cmsis-dsp
pkg_jsmn
pkg_micro-ecc
pkg_u8g2
posix_semaphore -> TEST4 fails due to timer drift, i.e. ~265 us difference to expected 1s
posix_sleep
pthread
pthread_barrier
pthread_cleanup
pthread_condition_variable
pthread_cooperation
pthread_rwlock
pthread_tls
saul
sched_testing
shell
sizeof_tcb
slip
struct_tm_utility
thread_basic
thread_cooperation
thread_exit
thread_flags
thread_flood
thread_msg
thread_msg_avail
thread_msg_block_wo_queue
thread_msg_block_w_queue
thread_msg_seq
warn_conflict
xtimer_drift -> after a handfull min running drift/jitter max: ~170 us
xtimer_hang
xtimer_longterm
xtimer_msg
xtimer_msg_receive_timeout
xtimer_now64_continuity
xtimer_remove
xtimer_reset
xtimer_usleep_until
zep

list made manually by executing:

ls -1a | sed  -e 's/^/- [ ] /'

in RIOT/tests and removing unittests et al. from the list

Release 2016.10 - RC2

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 2 of the 2016.10

Specs tested:

Release 2017.10 - RC1

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 1 of the 2017.10 release.

Specs tested:

02-tests/task 02 Release 2017.01 - RC2

Task # 02

Perform a subset of tests on `iotlab-m3` node:

list made manually by executing:

ls -1a | sed  -e 's/^/- [ ] /'

in RIOT/tests and removing unittests et al. from the list

Release 2018.01 - RC1

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 1 of the 2018.01 release.

Specs tested:

Release 2015.09 - RC4

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 4 of the 2015.09 release.

Specs tested:

01-CI
02-Tests
- Task 01:
  - tests/cpp11_* are failing on native, but work on iotlab-m3
  - Results of tests/malloc are ambigious
  - tests/msg_send_receive needs RIOT-OS/RIOT#4036
- all other tests succeed on native
- Task 02 and 03 succeed
03-Single Hop IPv6 ICMP
- Task 01: 1000 packets transmitted, 1000 received, 0% packet loss, time 10.06155388 s (and pktbuf is empty)
- Task 02: 1000 packets transmitted, 1000 received, 0% packet loss, time 100.06267042 s
- Task 03: 3600 packets transmitted, 3600 received, 0% packet loss, time 3600.06266335 s
04-Single Hop 6LoWPAN ICMP
- Task 01: 1000 packets transmitted, 1000 received, 0% packet loss, time 18.06298406 s
- Task 02: 1000 packets transmitted, 1000 received, 0% packet loss, time 119.06712665 s (and pktbuf is empty)
- Task 03: 1000 packets transmitted, 998 received, 1% packet loss, time 243.06217368 s
- Task 04: 10000 packets transmitted, 9996 received, 1% packet loss, time 1222.06596852 s
05-Single Hop Route
- Task 01: 100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 1.0619766 s
- Task 02: 100 packets transmitted, 99 received, 1% packet loss, time 16.06761171 s
- Task 03: 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 0.0693490 s
06-Single Hop UDP
- Task 01: tested with patched version in #7 (comment): Packets received: 999 (forgot to add od, so no pktbuf check possible, but should be alright)
07-Multi Hop
- Task 01:

window: [87, 104, 118, 144]
Setting route dead:beef::90 via fe80::3432:4833:46d8:8a16 for m3-87 ...success
Setting route :: via fe80::3432:4833:46d4:8822 for m3-104 ... success
Setting route dead:beef::90 via fe80::3432:4833:46df:8922 for m3-104 ...success
Setting route :: via fe80::3432:4833:46d8:8a16 for m3-118 ... success
Setting route dead:beef::90 via fe80::3432:4833:46da:9672 for m3-118 ...success
Setting route :: via fe80::3432:4833:46df:8922 for m3-144 ... success
Pinging (dead:beef::90) for node m3-87 ... success with 0% packet loss
Successfully pinged with 3 hops
SUCCESS

Task 02:

window: [162, 163, 165, 176]
Setting route dead:beef::b0 via fe80::3432:4833:46de:8922 for m3-162 ...success
Setting route :: via fe80::3432:4833:46d5:8a36 for m3-163 ... success
Setting route dead:beef::b0 via fe80::3432:4833:46d8:8726 for m3-163 ...success
Setting route :: via fe80::3432:4833:46de:8922 for m3-165 ... success
Setting route dead:beef::b0 via fe80::3432:4833:46d4:8d26 for m3-165 ...success
Setting route :: via fe80::3432:4833:46d8:8726 for m3-176 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Send UDP to dead:beef::b0 from node m3-162 ... success
Sent successfully with packet loss of 0.0%
Successfully communicated with UDP over 3 hops
SUCCESS

Task 03: SUCCESS with 0% - 10% packet loss
Task 04: Tested successfully manually.
- 08-Interop
Task 01:
- Floodping with 1.000.000 packets and default payload from Linux to RIOT: 1000000 packets transmitted, 1000000 received, 0% packet loss, time 33466ms
- Floodping with 100.000 packets and payload of 1kB from Linux to RIOT: 100000 packets transmitted, 100000 received, 0% packet loss, time 3684ms
- Floodping with 100.000 pacekts and default payload from RIOT to Linux: 100000 packets transmitted, 100000 received, 0% packet loss, time 3.06685815 s
Task 02:
- Floodping with 100.000 packets and default payload from Linux to RIOT: 100000 packets transmitted, 99648 received, 0% packet loss, time 1010348ms
- Flooding with 100.000 packets and 1kB payload from RIOT to Linux: 100000 packets transmitted, 93395 received, 7% packet loss, time 21539.06641653 s
For Linux testing a patched version of radvd is required, otherwise it won't send the SLLAO in the router advertisements.

02-tests/task 02 Release 2016.10 - RC3

Task # 02

Perform a subset of tests on `iotlab-m3` node:

bitarithm_timings
bloom_bytes OK but don't know if the output is right:

INFO # checking 10000 elements took 2145ms
INFO # 
INFO # 267 elements probably in the filter.
INFO # 9733 elements not in the filter.
INFO #  false positive rate.
INFO # 
INFO # All done!

This list is based on previous #23 with different test marked for this release. I also added the new ones which are systematically performed.

Release 2017.07 - RC2

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 2 of the 2017.07 release.

Specs tested:

Release 2015.09 - RC1

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 1 of the 2015.09 release.

Specs tested:

01-CI
02-Tests
[03-Single Hop IPv6 ICMP](https://github.com/RIOT-OS/Release-Specs/blob/master/specs/2015-09/ 03-single-hop-ipv6-icmp.md)
- For task 01, one has manually delete the link-local address from the bridge interface.
- All tasks succeeded without packet loss.
04-Single Hop 6LoWPAN ICMP
- Task 01: 1000 packets transmitted, 999 received, 1% packet loss, time 23.06321836 s
- Task 02: 1000 packets transmitted, 1000 received, 0% packet loss, time 113.06589983 s
- Task 03: 1000 packets transmitted, 992 received, 1% packet loss, time 280.06967510 s
- Task 04: '10000 packets transmitted, 9994 received, 1% packet loss, time 1270.06575971 s`
05-Single Hop Route
- Task 01: 100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 1.0618546 s
- Task 02: 100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 15.06920354 s
- Task 03: 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 0.0692178 s
06-Single Hop UDP
07-Multi Hop
- Task 01: 100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 6.06885310 s
- Task 02: Sent 100 UDP packets over 3 hops: 0% packet loss
08-Interop
- For Linux testing a patched version of radvd is required, otherwise it won't send the SLLAO in the router advertisements.

02-tests/task 01 Release 2017.01 - RC2

Part of the script to create the list:

find "$BASEDIR" -maxdepth 2 -mindepth 2 -type f \
    \( -name 'main.c' -or -name 'main.cpp' \) \
    -exec grep -Eq '@ingroup[[:blank:]]+\<test' {} \; \
    -print | sed 's#^\(.*\)/[^/]*$#\1#' | sort > "$LIST"

Create the markdown:

sed -e 's#^.*/$[^/]*$$#- [ ] \1#' "$LIST"

cpu: native: unexpected xtimer overflow

Somehow ~600ms after boot, xtimer overflows the first time. Somehow, that causes trouble.

See #12.

02-tests Release 2015.12 - RC3

Let's collect the test results for 02-tests here, task by task.

Release 2015.12 - RC3

Status of all tests for the Release Candidate 3 of the 2015.12 release.

Please check off all tests that performed successfully. Inline any errors/warnings you encounter in this list.
The names I assigned are tentative. Feel free to re-assign or execute tests that are not marked with your name.

Release 2016.04 - RC2

Release 2016.04 - RC2This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 2 of the 2016.04 release.

Specs tested:

Release 2017.04 - RC2

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 2 of the 2017.04 release.

Specs tested:

Release 2016.10 - RC3

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 3 of the 2016.10

Specs tested:

Task 7: arbitrary error margin?

Why does Task 7 ask for a success rate of <10% for UDP packets but a success rate of <20% for ICMPv6 packets? What -- in the author's mind -- made UDP (uses 8 byte header, has checksum, might be header compressed) more successful at delivering packets than ICMPv6 (uses 8 byte header, has checksum, is not header compressed). Just the fact that one is compressed and the other not?

Release 2015.12 - RC4

Status of all tests for the Release Candidate 4 of the 2015.12 release.

Please check off all tests that performed successfully. Inline any errors/warnings you encounter in this list.
The names I assigned are tentative. Feel free to re-assign or execute tests that are not marked with your name.

02-tests/task 03 Release 2017.01 - RC2

Task # 03

Perform a subset of tests (!= subset from Task #02) on `samr21-xpro` node:

list made manually by executing:

ls -1a | sed  -e 's/^/- [ ] /'

in RIOT/tests and removing unittests et al. from the list

02-tests/task 01 Release 2016.10 - RC3

02-tests/task 01 Release 2016.10 - RC4

Release 2015.09 - RC2

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 2 of the 2015.09 release.

Specs tested:

01-CI
02-Tests
03-Single Hop IPv6 ICMP
- Task 01: 1000 packets transmitted, 1000 received, 0% packet loss, time 10.06171217 s
- Task 02: 1000 packets transmitted, 1000 received, 0% packet loss, time 100.06128933 s
- Task 03: 3600 packets transmitted, 3600 received, 0% packet loss, time 3599.06917114 s
04-Single Hop 6LoWPAN ICMP
- Task 01: 1000 packets transmitted, 1000 received, 0% packet loss, time 18.06335692 s
- Task 02: 1000 packets transmitted, 999 received, 1% packet loss, time 109.06740717 s
- Task 03: 1000 packets transmitted, 993 received, 1% packet loss, time 276.06342833 s
- Task 04: 10000 packets transmitted, 9998 received, 1% packet loss, time 1313.06892156 s
05-Single Hop Route
- Task 01: 100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 1.0614627 s
- Task 02: 100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 16.068110 s
- Task 03: 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 0.0692516 s
06-Single Hop UDP
07-Multi Hop
08-Interop
- For Linux testing a patched version of radvd is required, otherwise it won't send the SLLAO in the router advertisements.

Release 2017.01 - RC2

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 2 of the 2017.01 release.

Specs tested:

Release 2015.12 - RC1

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 1 of the 2015.12 release.

Specs tested:

Release 2017.01 - RC1

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 1 of the 2017.01 release.

Specs tested:

02-tests/task 01 Release 2016.10 - RC1

Release 2017.10 - RC2

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 2 of the 2017.10 release.

NOTE
Please report all findings to this table
NOTE

Specs tested:

Release 2015.09 - RC3

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 3 of the 2015.09 release.

Specs tested:

01-CI
02-Tests
03-Single Hop IPv6 ICMP
04-Single Hop 6LoWPAN ICMP
05-Single Hop Route
06-Single Hop UDP
07-Multi Hop
08-Interop
- For Linux testing a patched version of radvd is required, otherwise it won't send the SLLAO in the router advertisements.

Release 2015.12 - pre-RC1

This issue lists the status of all tests before the Release Candidate 1 of the 2015.12 release.

Specs tested:

Release 2016.10 - RC4

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 4 of the 2016.10

Specs tested:

02-tests/task 01 Release 2016.07 - RC1

Task # 01

Execute all tests on `native` and check their output:

list made manually performing:

ls -1a | sed  -e 's/^/- [ ] /'

in RIOT/tests

Release 2016.04 - RC3

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 3 of the 2016.04 release.

Specs tested:

02-tests/task 02 Release 2016.07 - RC1

Task # 02

Perform a subset of tests on `iotlab-m3` node:

list made manually by executing:

ls -1a | sed  -e 's/^/- [ ] /'

in RIOT/tests and removing unittests et al. from the list

Release 2017.07 - RC1

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 1 of the 2017.07 release.

Specs tested:

02-tests/task 03 Release 2016.10 - RC4

Task #2.03

Perform a subset of tests on `samr21-xpro` node:

This list is based on previous #24 with different test marked for this release. I also added the new ones which are systematically performed.

Release 2015.09 - RC5

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 5 of the 2015.09 release. Only native related specs and those which were not tested in #7 are required here.

Specs tested:

01-CI
02-Tests
03-Single Hop IPv6 ICMP
- Task 01: 1000 packets transmitted, 1000 received, 0% packet loss, time 10.06728395 s
- Task 02: 1000 packets transmitted, 1000 received, 0% packet loss, time 100.06765821 s
- Task 03: 3600 packets transmitted, 3600 received, 0% packet loss, time 3600.06916673 s
05-Single Hop Route
- Task 01: 100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 1.0692095 s
- Task 02: see #7
- Task 03: 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 0.06102241 s
08-Interop
- Task 01: 1000000 packets transmitted, 1000000 received, 0% packet loss, time 202.06653731 s
- Task 02: see #7
- Task 03: no idea how to do pinging with Contiki, skipping.
- Task 04: Floodpinging 100.000 packets with default payload from a Linux host over a Raspberry Pi border router to a RIOT powered IoT-LAB-M3: 100000 packets transmitted, 83292 received, 16% packet loss, time 1231630ms
- Task 05: Pinging from a Linux host over a SAMR21 RIOT based border router to a RIOT powered IoT-LAB-M3, 100.000 packets with an interval of 50ms: 100000 packets transmitted, 99770 received, 0% packet loss, time 5055033ms
- For Linux testing a patched version of radvd is required, otherwise it won't send the SLLAO in the router advertisements.

02-tests/task 02 Release 2016.10 - RC4

Task # 02

Perform a subset of tests on `iotlab-m3` node:

bitarithm_timings
bloom_bytes OK but don't know if the output is right:

INFO # checking 10000 elements took 2145ms
INFO # 
INFO # 267 elements probably in the filter.
INFO # 9733 elements not in the filter.
INFO #  false positive rate.
INFO # 
INFO # All done!

This list is based on previous #23 with different test marked for this release. I also added the new ones which are systematically performed.

Task 6: Questionable test parameters

When testing for the last release I wondered why UDP over 6LoWPAN has less error margin (<5%) than ICMPv6 over 6LoWPAN (<10%). Especially since Task 6 asks for way harder to deliver 1kB, while some of Task 5's specs only ask for 0B. Is there a specific reason for these 5%?

The other questionable thing more from a timing constraint is: Why does the delay need to be 1s? For testing it is really a long amount of time to send 1000 packets (~17min), while the tests would be as significant if the interval between them would be 50ms or 100ms.

02-tests/task 01 Release 2016.10 - RC2

02-tests/task 01 Release 2017.07 - RC2

Part of the script to create the list:

find "$BASEDIR" -maxdepth 2 -mindepth 2 -type f \
    \( -name 'main.c' -or -name 'main.cpp' \) \
    -exec grep -Eq '@ingroup[[:blank:]]+\<test' {} \; \
    -print | sed 's#^\(.*\)/[^/]*$#\1#' | sort > "$LIST"

Create the markdown:

sed -e 's#^.*/$[^/]*$$#- [ ] \1#' "$LIST"

arm-none-eabi-g++ \
        -DRIOT_FILE_RELATIVE=\"tests/cpp11_condition_variable/main.cpp\" \
        -DRIOT_FILE_NOPATH=\"main.cpp\" \
        -Werror -mcpu=cortex-m3 -mlittle-endian -mthumb -mfloat-abi=soft -mno-thumb-interwork -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-builtin -fshort-enums -ggdb -g3 -Os -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -Werror=strict-prototypes -Werror=old-style-definition -fno-common -Wall -include '/home/oleg/git/RIOT/tests/cpp11_condition_variable/bin/cc2538dk/riotbuild/riotbuild.h' -std=c++11 -isystem /usr/arm-none-eabi/include/nano -isystem /usr/arm-none-eabi/include -I/home/oleg/git/RIOT/core/include -I/home/oleg/git/RIOT/drivers/include -I/home/oleg/git/RIOT/sys/include -I/home/oleg/git/RIOT/cpu/cc2538/include -I/home/oleg/git/RIOT/boards/cc2538dk/include -I/home/oleg/git/RIOT/cpu/cortexm_common/include -I/home/oleg/git/RIOT/sys/libc/include -I/home/oleg/git/RIOT/sys/cpp11-compat/include  -MD -MP -c -o /home/oleg/git/RIOT/tests/cpp11_condition_variable/bin/cc2538dk/cpp11_condition_variable/main.o /home/oleg/git/RIOT/tests/cpp11_condition_variable/main.cpp
In file included from /usr/arm-none-eabi/include/c++/6.2.0/ext/string_conversions.h:41:0,
                 from /usr/arm-none-eabi/include/c++/6.2.0/bits/basic_string.h:5402,
                 from /usr/arm-none-eabi/include/c++/6.2.0/string:52,
                 from /home/oleg/git/RIOT/tests/cpp11_condition_variable/main.cpp:21:
/usr/arm-none-eabi/include/c++/6.2.0/cstdlib:75:25: fatal error: stdlib.h: No such file or directory
 #include_next <stdlib.h>
                         ^

However:

`# ls -lah /usr/arm-none-eabi/include/c++/6.2.0/stdlib.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.2K Aug 31 19:52 /usr/arm-none-eabi/include/c++/6.2.0/stdlib.h

riot-os / release-specs Goto Github PK

release-specs's People

Contributors

Stargazers

Watchers

Forkers

release-specs's Issues

Task # 03

Perform a subset of tests (!= subset from Task #02) on samr21-xpro node:

Task # 02

Perform a subset of tests on iotlab-m3 node:

Task # 02

Perform a subset of tests on iotlab-m3 node:

Task # 03

Perform a subset of tests (!= subset from Task #02) on samr21-xpro node:

Task # 01

Execute all tests on native and check their output:

Task # 02

Perform a subset of tests on iotlab-m3 node:

Task #2.03

Perform a subset of tests on samr21-xpro node:

Task # 02

Perform a subset of tests on iotlab-m3 node:

Recommend Projects

Recommend Topics

Recommend Org

Perform a subset of tests (!= subset from Task #02) on `samr21-xpro` node:

Perform a subset of tests on `iotlab-m3` node:

Perform a subset of tests on `iotlab-m3` node:

Perform a subset of tests (!= subset from Task #02) on `samr21-xpro` node:

Execute all tests on `native` and check their output:

Perform a subset of tests on `iotlab-m3` node:

Perform a subset of tests on `samr21-xpro` node:

Perform a subset of tests on `iotlab-m3` node: