Thanks for the clarification!
In the case where the user selects no on CYW, I also think the (!) icon and text should be red. It is listed under proposed updates here. Should I go ahead and make that change (along with removing "Try the steps again")?
Yes, let's go with that. There was some feedback in a google doc comment, in favor of having the icon color in the task match the icon color in the CYW section, which makes sense.
There was also some concern raised about using red, but since that requires discussion with the larger design team, I would defer that to a separate issue to update both the icon color and CYW section at the same time. For now I've added an agenda item for the next meeting to discuss.
A remaining case which I am unclear on how to handle is the when the user visits the task, opens the CYW section, but makes no selection before moving on to the next task. (See task 2 from the example screenshot with Review task status.) Should "Try the steps again" be displayed? Should the icon change to (!) like step 3, and if so should we use a different color to indicate a difference in state from Visited task status like task 3?
There was a previous issue to have the CYW prompt always visible (i.e. not require the user to hit Next to see a CYW prompt): #3. This issue is closed, but when I look at the demo, I see the original behavior is still there. @jschuler Can you comment on this? Is that behavior configurable by the consumer?
To answer @CooperRedhat's question, if it is configurable that the CYW section is not always visible, then I would expect these two states to be displayed the same way—with a blue number and a "Try the steps again" statement. As an FYI, we want to review the current quick start behavior with usability testing, so it's possible there will be new insights to inform the design of this.
- 2: visited, CYW opened, no selection made.
-- Review task status
- 3: visited, CYW never opened before continuing to next step.
-- Will only happen when a user selects a later step from the intro page of the QS, because clicking next first opens CYW before moving to next step (which I THINK is what you mean by skipping a step)
-- Visited task status
Originally posted by @jgiardino in #56 (comment)