ihe / formatcode Goto Github PK

1. IHE Pharmacy has two content profiles IHE MTP and IHE CMA which are not listed in the CodeSystem formatCode

2. The formatcode urn:ihe:pcc:irc:2008 should be urn:ihe:pcc:ic:2008 according to https://www.ihe.net/uploadedFiles/Documents/PCC/IHE_PCC_TF_Vol2.pdf, page 34.

The second sentence in section 1.1 currently says:
"Given that the FormatCode is contriuted to by many IHE domains"...

Change "contriuted" to "contributed"

Issue
Two Format Codes from the Eye Care CCDA-GEE supplement and one from the EC Summary supplement need to be added to the FormatCode IG

Proposed Change
Add the following codes (from Section 5.1 of the CCDA-GEE supplement):

• General Eye Evaluation (GEE) C-CDA Progress Note urn:ihe:eyecare:geneyeevalpn:2014 text/xml 1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.12.1.1.2

• General Eye Evaluation (GEE) C-CDA Consultation Note urn:ihe:eyecare:geneyeevalcn:2014 text/xml 1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.12.1.1.3

Add the following code from the EC Summary Supplement

• Eye Care Summary Record (EC-Summary) urn:ihe:eyecare:summary:2015 text/xml 1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.12.1.1.4

Priority:

• Medium: Significant issue or clarification. Requires discussion, but should not lead to long debate.

should we add the concept-property#inactive to the deprecated codes?

I am not sure what is best-practice. I have asked HL7
https://jira.hl7.org/browse/FHIR-42956

The footer of the publication does not have the github issues mentioned

initial request from @vassilpeytchev via email for

urn:ihe:pcc:360x:hl7:OMG:O19:2017

and

urn:ihe:pcc:360x:hl7:OSU:O51:2017

The codeSystem description should not mention the wiki

The ValueSet tries to pull in the HL7 codes, and succeeds somehow.

But the formal codeSystem available from HL7 is now at

http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-HL7DocumentFormatCodes

I have been taking a close look at our formatCode value set and codeSystem in the context of some SVCM test preparation.

This Github issue points out some inconsistencies (my view). You can correct any misconceptions.

First, I am looking here: https://profiles.ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/ValueSet-formatcode.html

The “Definition” at the top includes this statement:
“The IHE FormatCode Value set is defined to be the set of FormatCode(s) defined by IHE http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=IHE_Format_Codes…”.
...and that wiki page has been scrubbed (hurray) to remove the list of codes and instead include a summary including “ This FormatCode vocabulary represents: Code System 1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.2.3 “ (which I believe is the equivalent of http://ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/CodeSystem/formatcode).

In Sec 3.1.1.1, the "Logical Definition" of what the value set contains includes the IHE format CodeSystem, one DICOM code for the KOS manifest, and the HL7 codes for C-CDA docs (what I would expect).

ISSUE 1: There is a slight incongruity between the text in the Definition and the Logical Definition. I think the text in the Definition at the top more accurately describes the Code System http://ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/CodeSystem/formatcode and not the Value Set http://ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/ValueSet/formatcode

====
Next, I am looking here https://profiles.ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/CodeSystem-formatcode.html

The “Definition: up top includes this statement:
"The IHE FormatCode code system with canonical URI of http://ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/CodeSystem/formatcode is defined to be the set of [FormatCode(s) define by IHE (http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=IHE_Format_Codes), ..."
And this is what I would expect for IHE’s formatCode Code System.

ISSUE 2 Why does IHE’s codeSystem include the deprecated concepts with C-CDA codes having a system value of “http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/hl7-document-format-code”? It seems like they could be removed, especially since the HL7 implementation guide you link in the description include both C-CDA 1.1 and 2.1 codes, and only the 1.1 deprecated codes are in our format code code system

====

**ISSUE 3 (**documented here, even though “it’s not IHE’s problem” :-) ):
Our format code value set: https://profiles.ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/ValueSet-formatcode.html

…includes all codes defined in http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/hl7-document-format-codes

For the life of me, I cannot find a Code System with the above canonical URI.

John says,
well... that is
a) Not an IHE problem
b) really strange as the IG build finds it
c) really strange because it doesn't seem to be there
d) Not an IHE problem

Note about (c)... this link you have is a canonical URI. It is not expected to be able to produce anything in a browser. yet, often Grahame manages a huge redirect database at HL7 to redirect these things. However these codes can't be found even if one browses to http://terminology.hl7.org

I have been complaining to the HL7 terminology group for almost two years
https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/179202-terminology/topic/CDA.20format.20code.20vocabulary

Reference: https://profiles.ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/ValueSet-formatcode.html

In this latest revision of IHE format codes, we have updated the Display Names. Now the display names (mostly) follow a pattern (domain and profile acronym, eg PCC APS) (Note that the “description” (which is not sent in a code/scheme/display triplet) is more descriptive, so I'm not a fan of the change, but I'm not writing an issue for that).

REQUEST: please change the Display for code urn:ihe:rad:CDA:ImagingReportStructuredHeadings:2013. It is currently “RAD XDS-I”, which is too generic. If you followed the pattern used in DENT (DENT TEXT, DENT PDF, DENT CDA), then you would change the code to “RAD CDA” (because RAD TEXT and RAD PDF exist).

(Note, also, that there are other Display values that do not follow the pattern (e.g. "Care Management (CM), but that is not in my domain, so I am also not writing this issue about that).

New informative message from the IG builder
CodeSystems SHOULD have a stated value for the hierarchyMeaning element so that users know the status and meaning of the code system clearly.

when we want to use the current published formatcode package an error message appears:

oad Package hl7.terminology.r4#2.0.0
2021-04-23 11:14:09.624 [main] INFO o.h.f.u.npm.BasePackageCacheManager [BasePackageCacheManager.java:80] Failed to resolve package ihe.formatcode.fhir#0.2.4 from server: http://packages.fhir.org
2021-04-23 11:14:09.987 [main] INFO o.h.f.u.npm.BasePackageCacheManager [BasePackageCacheManager.java:80] Failed to resolve package ihe.formatcode.fhir#0.2.4 from server: http://packages2.fhir.org/packages
2021-04-23 11:14:10.784 [main] INFO o.h.f.u.npm.BasePackageCacheManager [BasePackageCacheManager.java:80] Failed to resolve package ihe.formatcode.fhir#0.2.x from server: http://packages.fhir.org
2021-04-23 11:14:11.252 [main] INFO o.h.f.u.npm.BasePackageCacheManager [BasePackageCacheManager.java:80] Failed to resolve package ihe.formatcode.fhir#0.2.x from server: http://packages2.fhir.org/packages
Installing ihe.formatcode.fhir#0.2.4 to the package cache
Fetching:Publishing Content Failed: Error reading http://profiles.ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/0.2.4/package.tgz: Input is not in the .gz format (00:45.0446)
(00:45.0451)
Use -? to get command line help (00:45.0454)
(00:45.0458)
Stack Dump (for debugging): (00:45.0463)
java.io.IOException: Error reading http://profiles.ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/0.2.4/package.tgz: Input is not in the .gz format
at org.hl7.fhir.utilities.npm.NpmPackage.readStream(NpmPackage.java:379)
at org.hl7.fhir.utilities.npm.NpmPackage.fromPackage(NpmPackage.java:370)
at org.hl7.fhir.utilities.npm.FilesystemPackageCacheManager.addPackageToCache(File

1. ihe.formatcode.fhir does not appear in the registry , is IHE planning a package feed for their publications?
2. it looks like the package itself is also not published under http://profiles.ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/0.2.4/, could this be added?

This is a test pull request.

as a normative spec, this should be at least 1.0.0

<entry xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"> <fullUrl value="http://profiles.ihe.net/fhir/ihe.formatcode.fhir/Provenance/20200724"/> <resource> <Provenance> <id value="formatcode-provenance-20200724"/>

1. fullUrl must be either a valid reference to the resource, or a urn UUID, (or urn OID)
2. fullUrl and Provenance.id within the entry must match

the codeSystem should mention the old, and deprecated canonical URI. (Deprecated because it indicates a ValueSet as a CodeSystem)
http://ihe.net/fhir/ValueSet/IHE.FormatCode.codesystem

The FormatCode ValueSet contains...

I cannot find this CodeSystem. What am I missing?