This repo contains a few benchmarks that compare RaiSim to DART robotic simulators.

All simulations are ran for 10 seconds of simulated time with an integration time-step of 0.001 seconds. We replicated each experiment 10 times on a laptop CPU.

The exact timings are not important, but the relative timings showcase that RaiSim is consistently faster than DART (ranging from 5-30x times faster depending on the number of contacts and the scene). It is normal that RaiSim is faster than DART when there are contacts, since RaiSim implements a novel idea about contact dynamics solving that is supposed to be faster. It is interesting to note though that RaiSim is much faster than DART even in contact-free scenarios by at least 5x.

You can find this benchmark in anymal_benchmark.cpp file. The simulation consists of an ANYmal quadruped robot fixed with a weld joint, and that has to keep the current joint configuration. The robot is torque-controlled with a PD controller. There are no contacts involved.

RaiSim average running time for 10s of simulation: 0.0405115s (real-time factor: 246.844)

DART average running time for 10s of simulation: 0.215082s (real-time factor: 46.4938)

RaiSim is 5.30917 times faster than DART.

You can find this benchmark in anymal_contacts_benchmark.cpp file. The simulation consists of four (4) ANYmal quadruped robots that have to keep the current joint configuration in order to stay standing (interacting with a ground). The robots are torque-controlled with a PD controller. This simulation involves contacts.

RaiSim average running time for 10s of simulation: 0.438723s (real-time factor: 22.7934)

DART average running time for 10s of simulation: 3.55465s (real-time factor: 2.81322)

RaiSim is 8.10225 times faster than DART.

You can find this benchmark in iiwa_benchmark.cpp file. The simulation consists of a KUKA IIWA 14 robot fixed with a weld joint, and that has to achieve a certain joint configuration starting from an upright position. The robot is torque-controlled with a PD controller. There are no contacts involved.

RaiSim average running time for 10s of simulation: 0.0237632s (real-time factor: 420.819)

DART average running time for 10s of simulation: 0.122529s (real-time factor: 81.6136)

RaiSim is 5.15623 times faster than DART.

You can find this benchmark in pexod_benchmark.cpp file. The simulation consists of four (4) simple 6-legged robots (pexod) that have to keep the current joint configuration in order to stay standing (interacting with a ground). The robots are torque-controlled with a PD controller. This simulation involves contacts.

RaiSim average running time for 10s of simulation: 0.716966s (real-time factor: 13.9477)

DART average running time for 10s of simulation: 9.80957s (real-time factor: 1.01941)

RaiSim is 13.6821 times faster than DART.

You can find this benchmark in objects_benchmark.cpp file. The simulation consists of multiple spheres and boxes that interact with each other and the ground. There is no controller; the objects are just following gravity. This simulation involves many contacts.

RaiSim average running time for 10s of simulation: 1.21893s (real-time factor: 8.20393)

DART average running time for 10s of simulation: 37.7686s (real-time factor: 0.26477)

RaiSim is 30.9851 times faster than DART.

• Install DART (we need also the Bullet-Collision) and RaiSim (in a local path)
• mkdir build
• cmake .. -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=/path/where/RaiSim/is/installed
• make -j
• The executables have the same names as the source files. They should be located inside the build folder.