Code Monkey home page Code Monkey logo

Comments (1)

nus-pe-bot avatar nus-pe-bot commented on July 19, 2024

Team's Response

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this!
We feel that there will be users like you who'd feel overwhelmed by all the information but there will also be users who'd possibly complain about the lack of details about all our commands if we were to remove such information. As such, its best to have the information there to make it explicitly clear than to not have it at all. Moreover, a detailed UG will help you avoid errors in your commands and accomodate easier troubleshooting as you'll know what went wrong and what commands are acceptable along with their parameters.

As such, we're rejecting this. Thanks for sharing though!

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

  • I disagree

Reason for disagreement: I believe this is still a bug as it places the burden on the user to have to watch out for all these invalid cases that the app is unable to handle by himself. Especially if these invalid inputs are not rejected properly by the app itself (e.g. a previous bug that I posted saying how the program still accepts an input with duplicate dates by taking the first one). This means that the burden of avoiding these invalid inputs fall very heavily on the user if the app is not sufficiently defensive against these (such as the order of the separators and typing multiple identical separators may cause parsing of incorrect input). I believe that it is the responsibility of the developers to ensure the app rejects such incorrect inputs rather than telling the user to avoid them himself just because the app may parse things wrongly. Hence, while it is reasonable to some degree to inform users of the limitations of the app (such as the parameters it is using), I believe that the current list is too much.


❓ Issue severity

Team chose [severity.VeryLow]
Originally [severity.High]

  • I disagree

Reason for disagreement: Maybe more of medium severity, as having all these limitations written in the UG (and having the user be careful of following them) can pose quite significant inconvenience to the user of having to watch out for all these things all the time, all the more especially if the behaviour of the app is inconsistent with these invalid cases (e.g. typing multiple separators may sometimes cause incorrect parsing of input).


from pe.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.