timsong-cpp / cppwp Goto Github PK

Currently only the trunk version uses the updated cxxdraft-htmlgen that does syntax highlighting and is generally nicer to look at IMO. Compare:

• Eelis version / cppwp trunk
• C++11
• C++14
• C++17

Is it possible to update them?

For some days now, the monospace font used into the docs is broken.

The CSS served to me is

.codeblock {
    font-family: Noto Mono;
    /* ... */
}

and this is obtained from https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Noto+Mono which results in a 400 code. The URL seems to have moved to https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Noto+Sans+Mono.

I'm not entirely sure who's responsible, since the htmlgen repo seems to use Roboto Mono now, and I couldn't find any place in this repo where Noto Mono appears in code.

The current working draft is dated from 9/30/19. However, the actual current working draft paper (N4835 ) is dated from 10/08/19.

This causes some things to be different between them. For example, [expr.prim.id]/3 defines when the names of immediate functions can be used. The September draft states:

An id-expression that denotes an immediate function ([dcl.constexpr]) shall appear as a subexpression of an immediate invocation or in an immediate function context ([expr.const]).

While the October draft has more updated wording:

An id-expression that denotes an immediate function (9.2.5) shall appear only

• (3.1) as a subexpression of an immediate invocation, or
• (3.2) in an immediate function context (7.7)

The difference is small, but it is there. In particular, the word "only" appears in the latter one (it's probably not strictly necessary, as "shall appear" ought to be good enough, but they felt the need to add it).

This seems to be the only final working draft of C++23.

Is it possible to add human-readable aliases like https://wg21.link/stdXX?

E.g., https://timsong-cpp.github.io/cppwp/cpp11 for https://timsong-cpp.github.io/cppwp/n3337.

N4868 only contains editorial fixes since the C++20 standard (see N4867). IMO N4868, like N3337/N4140, is more preferable than N4861.

<!-- index.html -->
<div id="dcl.type.class.deduct">
    <h4>
         <a class="secnum" … >9.2.9.7</a>

          Deduced class template specialization types

         <a class="abbr_ref" href="dcl.type.class.deduct"> <!---- Broken link -->
          [dcl.type.class.deduct]
         </a>
          ...
</h4>

The index.html file contains broken links. It should be:

 <a href="dcl.type.class.deduct.html" >