Retry.timeouts() are descending when using a factor < 1 about node-retry HOT 1 CLOSED

Inverting the array would break the maxTimeout, wouldn't ?. now the minTimeout would also be the maxTimeout ?

> r.timeouts({factor: 0.5, retries: 3, minTimeout: 1000})
[ 1000, 500, 250 ] // original result

A good output to be consistent with others timeouts would be
[1000, 1250, 1500]

Let me know what are yours thoughts about it.

UPDATE.
I just realized about another option, a factor < 1, implicitly says it wants to grow each time less, so consider the normal output:

> r.timeouts({factor: 0.5, retries: 3, minTimeout: 1000})
[ 1000, 500, 250 ] // 125, 87, etc

A timeouts array that grow each time less:

original output:          [ 1000, 500, 250 ] // 125, 87, etc
slow grow 1:        [1000, 2000, 2500, 2750] 
slow grow 2:              [1000, 1500, 1750]

This last example for me is more natural for what factor < 1 should be doing.

In the other hand, the output [ 250, 500, 1000 ] is easy to get if you specify the correct timeouts parameters in the following way:

> retry.timeouts({factor: 2, retries: 3, minTimeout: 250})
[ 250, 500, 1000 ]

So, please let me know what do you guys think about this.
@tim-kos @felixge

from node-retry.