http://blogs.plos.org/plos/2012/05/call-for-papers-plos-text-mining-collection/

Different?

Define in text?

• make sure code is all still working and up to date
• fill out any explanation around the code
• make code output as brief as possible

Or maybe not 🤔 e.g. is data xml, pdf

At the first occurrence of "tidy data.frame"

search for "FIXME"

I see no hyphen in the title but a hyphen in the abstract. 🙂

So that readers that you have convinced might know how to learn (link to docs, to forum etc)

The title should be "Crossref and Datacite".

Can you explain in that section what the difference is between rcrossref and crminer?

• need for more tools and discussion of tools. Also need for user-friendlier tools and more docs?

• R is free

If ready in time use the docs.ropensci.org links instead of GitHub repos?

Write "image of text" to make it clearer? Even if obvious

That section does not define Scopus?

The thing you write between parentheses about xml is mentioned in the intro so maybe add "as mentioned previously"?

The catalogue of sources and packages is important but less exciting/fun than seeing use cases I thinl? To catch readers' attention.

What can users use once they have the data. Tidytext, cleannlp etc.

You can re run the code to update results.

You can share the recipe with other researchers who can e.g. just adapt the query.

Etc

In "The primary reason is publishers"maybe replace publishers with "publishers diversity of blabla"?

I think the abstract should mention more clearly that fulltext aims at providing an unique interface so the hard work is invisible to the user or sthg like that, the word interface being important.