samotiian / ccsa Goto Github PK

Hello, the pic in MNIST is 28 * 28 and the pic in USPS is 16 * 16. Do you preprocess MNIST to make it into 16*16? And do you use the MMD to handle the date in the both two datasets? Thank you.

Hello, is the raw data just from MNIST and USPS dataset or is preprocessed by some methods like MMD? I am really confused about this, looking froward your answer. Thank you very much.

Hello! Thank you for sharing the code of CCSA in Github. I'm new to Domain Adaptation and I want to reproduce the result of CCSA. But I have a question.

In MNIST-USPS experiment, the paper says that

We evaluated our approach for n ranging from 1 to 8 and repeated each experiment 10 times(we only show the mean of the accuracies because the standard deviation is very small).

Ref: Section 5.1.2 in ICCV paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.10190.pdf)

But the results between different repetitions in my reproduced is not very small?(acc between 86 and 94)?Is that normal?

Please forgive me if I ask a silly question.

Hi, thank You for making the code publicly available.
There is a subtle bug in the implementation when multiple experiments are run. Tensorflow and Keras do not reset model parameters automatically, so by training the model in a loop with varying data, the model is accumulating knowledge from all splits, and not only one as intended.

I have created a pull request (#9) that fixes the issue.

Hi there, very excellent work!
I reproduce the experiment this afternoon. However, when I run main.py, the code doesn't work at all.
It says there is no such file named ./row_data/MNIST_to_USPS_X_train_target_repetition_0_sample_per_class_1.npy
I checked the disk, there is no such file.
Plus, there is also no 'y_' file. Could you please check the repo?

Hi, @samotiian , thank you for your implementation. With respect to the code, could you please upload the code for domain generalization? It would be great help for reproducing the experiment results.
Thanks,

Can you release the code for VLCS dataset, please?

Hi, thank you for sharing the code! It is beneficial for me to understand the detail of the method.

I have two questions:
(1) I think your implementation uses Convolutio2D(32, 3, 3). However, the paper says that uses Convolution2D(6, 5, 5), which is inconsistent. Which is correct for reproducing the results?

Quick Ref: Section 5.1.2 in ICCV paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.10190.pdf)

Similar to [37], we used 2 convolutional layers with 6 and 16 filters of 5 × 5 kernels followed by max-pooling layers and 2 fully connected layers with size 120 and 84 ...

(2) Your implementation also uses Dropout in some parts. Is this also used for the reported values?

Thanks.