Code Monkey home page Code Monkey logo

community's Introduction

OKD Community

This repository contains community process, charter, and coordination documents for the OKD project.

Designs, technical proposals, and issues are tracked in the openshift/enhancements repo.

Get involved

Discuss on:

OKD Working Group Meetings

The OKD Working Group meets on a Bi-weekly cadence on Tuesdays at 17:00 UTC

If you have a proposed topic for the upcoming meeting, please add an issue to the https://github.com/openshift/community/ repo with label "OKD-WG Proposed Topic" and be sure to include the date of the meeting you which to present on!

Meeting Schedule is maintained here: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/okd/

Meeting Agenda and Topics can be found here: https://github.com/openshift/community/projects/1

Meeting dial-in details, meeting notes and agendas are announced and published to the OKD-WG mailing list on Google Groups

community's People

Contributors

beelzetron avatar cgruver avatar dmueller2001 avatar elmiko avatar jaywryan avatar klaas- avatar lorbuschris avatar openshift-merge-robot avatar sandrobonazzola avatar smarterclayton avatar vrutkovs avatar

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

community's Issues

OKD-WG Proposed Topic

Many people, including me, are interested in learning Open Source technologies, including Openshift. Despite there are few documents in the Internet about creating a single-node Openshift cluster, I haven't been able to build a working lab based on that guides after a month of trying. I think it would be great if there were a one-hour workshop or lab guide which actually works at the end. So many people have access to an ESXi server so if they are able to build a small lab for themselves, They can begin to play with it at home. I can attempt to the meeting on any time, including upcoming March, 2nd. Thanks.

Add Freark van der Bos

@LorbusChris and i realized after the charter was out that firing a PR process will cause this issue however we didn't want to pull and change the charter. We'll follow up after it gets merged.

What we should have done was to ask folks to create a github issue in this repo and either @LorbusChris or i would have created the PR and merge it to avoid asking you to rebase, sorry for inconvenience ... we are learning as we go and will try to adjust/ imrpove the process

As such for tracking purpose i'll create the request here as a github issue and then i'll personally open a PR and deal with the rebase rather than asking you to fix our own problem.

Sorry for the inconvenience and support as we learning through

Add Michael McCune

@LorbusChris and i realized after the charter was out that firing a PR process will cause this issue however we didn't want to pull and change the charter. We'll follow up after it gets merged.

What we should have done was to ask folks to create a github issue in this repo and either @LorbusChris or i would have created the PR and merge it to avoid asking you to rebase, sorry for inconvenience ... we are learning as we go and will try to adjust/ imrpove the process

As such for tracking purpose i'll create the request here as a github issue and then i'll personally open a PR and deal with the rebase rather than asking you to fix our own problem.

Sorry for the inconvenience and support as we learning through

Add James Cassell

@LorbusChris and i realized after the charter was out that firing a PR process will cause this issue however we didn't want to pull and change the charter. We'll follow up after it gets merged.

What we should have done was to ask folks to create a github issue in this repo and either @LorbusChris or i would have created the PR and merge it to avoid asking you to rebase, sorry for inconvenience ... we are learning as we go and will try to adjust/ imrpove the process

As such for tracking purpose i'll create the request here as a github issue and then i'll personally open a PR and deal with the rebase rather than asking you to fix our own problem.

Sorry for the inconvenience and support as we learning through

Add Jason Brooks

@LorbusChris and i realized after the charter was out that firing a PR process will cause this issue however we didn't want to pull and change the charter. We'll follow up after it gets merged.

What we should have done was to ask folks to create a github issue in this repo and either @LorbusChris or i would have created the PR and merge it to avoid asking you to rebase, sorry for inconvenience ... we are learning as we go and will try to adjust/ imrpove the process

As such for tracking purpose i'll create the request here as a github issue and then i'll personally open a PR and deal with the rebase rather than asking you to fix our own problem.

Sorry for the inconvenience and support as we learning through

Add Stephen Greene

@LorbusChris and i realized after the charter was out that firing a PR process will cause this issue however we didn't want to pull and change the charter. We'll follow up after it gets merged.

What we should have done was to ask folks to create a github issue in this repo and either @LorbusChris or i would have created the PR and merge it to avoid asking you to rebase, sorry for inconvenience ... we are learning as we go and will try to adjust/ imrpove the process

As such for tracking purpose i'll create the request here as a github issue and then i'll personally open a PR and deal with the rebase rather than asking you to fix our own problem.

Sorry for the inconvenience and support as we learning through

Add Philipp Dallig

@LorbusChris and i realized after the charter was out that firing a PR process will cause this issue however we didn't want to pull and change the charter. We'll follow up after it gets merged.

What we should have done was to ask folks to create a github issue in this repo and either @LorbusChris or i would have created the PR and merge it to avoid asking you to rebase, sorry for inconvenience ... we are learning as we go and will try to adjust/ imrpove the process

As such for tracking purpose i'll create the request here as a github issue and then i'll personally open a PR and deal with the rebase rather than asking you to fix our own problem.

Sorry for the inconvenience and support as we learning through

Packit for OKD<->Fedora integration

In the previous OKD WG meetings, we've discussed Packit and how we'd like to use it to make integrating OKD code into Fedora a lot smoother.

There seems to be some confusion about Packit's current state of affairs as well as its goals.

@TomasTomecek, could you comment on this (and perhaps come to an OKD WG meeting to discuss this?)

Add Klaas Demter

@LorbusChris and i realized after the charter was out that firing a PR process will cause this issue however we didn't want to pull and change the charter. We'll follow up after it gets merged.

What we should have done was to ask folks to create a github issue in this repo and either @LorbusChris or i would have created the PR and merge it to avoid asking you to rebase, sorry for inconvenience ... we are learning as we go and will try to adjust/ imrpove the process

As such for tracking purpose i'll create the request here as a github issue and then i'll personally open a PR and deal with the rebase rather than asking you to fix our own problem.

Sorry for the inconvenience and support as we learning through

OKD Working Group Meeting Time

At the last OKD WG mtg, the OKD Working Group Meeting time was set to 17:00 UTC on Tuesdays on a Bi-weekly cadence on Tuesdays.

However, the group wanted to open a discussion on the optimal time for the call.

If you have feedback on the 17:00 UTC time that we've settled on, please add a comment.

If you are okay with the 17:00 UTC time, give the issue a thumbs up in the reaction option.

Add Glenn West

@LorbusChris and i realized after the charter was out that firing a PR process will cause this issue however we didn't want to pull and change the charter. We'll follow up after it gets merged.

What we should have done was to ask folks to create a github issue in this repo and either @LorbusChris or i would have created the PR and merge it to avoid asking you to rebase, sorry for inconvenience ... we are learning as we go and will try to adjust/ imrpove the process

As such for tracking purpose i'll create the request here as a github issue and then i'll personally open a PR and deal with the rebase rather than asking you to fix our own problem.

Sorry for the inconvenience and support as we learning through

Proposed Topic: Code-Ready Containers and OKD4

OKD-WG Mtg: Oct 29h 17:00 UTC
Suggested Speaker: @cgruver Charro Gruver

If you look at these two repos:
Code Ready Containers: https://github.com/code-ready/crc
Single Node Cluster: https://github.com/code-ready/snc
You can get a feel for what we'll need to do to make it work with OKD4. It really should not be too big a deal. I've been playing with building crc from source and using snc to build a bundle that crc can consume. I use an openshift-installer built from the 4.1 branch with Libvirt support enabled.
There's still some rough edges, and it's currently dependent on pulling RHCOS from the official redhat registry and OCP images from either quay.io or the redhat registry.
But, there's definitely a path for us to modify it to pull FCOS qcows images for the OS and to take an OKD image from a local or public registry.

Add Gleidson Nascimento

@LorbusChris and i realized after the charter was out that firing a PR process will cause this issue however we didn't want to pull and change the charter. We'll follow up after it gets merged.

What we should have done was to ask folks to create a github issue in this repo and either @LorbusChris or i would have created the PR and merge it to avoid asking you to rebase, sorry for inconvenience ... we are learning as we go and will try to adjust/ imrpove the process

As such for tracking purpose i'll create the request here as a github issue and then i'll personally open a PR and deal with the rebase rather than asking you to fix our own problem.

Sorry for the inconvenience and support as we learning through

Add Charro Gruver

@LorbusChris and i realized after the charter was out that firing a PR process will cause this issue however we didn't want to pull and change the charter. We'll follow up after it gets merged.

What we should have done was to ask folks to create a github issue in this repo and either @LorbusChris or i would have created the PR and merge it to avoid asking you to rebase, sorry for inconvenience ... we are learning as we go and will try to adjust/ imrpove the process

As such for tracking purpose i'll create the request here as a github issue and then i'll personally open a PR and deal with the rebase rather than asking you to fix our own problem.

Sorry for the inconvenience and support as we learning through

Add Brian Jarvis

@LorbusChris and i realized after the charter was out that firing a PR process will cause this issue however we didn't want to pull and change the charter. We'll follow up after it gets merged.

What we should have done was to ask folks to create a github issue in this repo and either @LorbusChris or i would have created the PR and merge it to avoid asking you to rebase, sorry for inconvenience ... we are learning as we go and will try to adjust/ imrpove the process

As such for tracking purpose i'll create the request here as a github issue and then i'll personally open a PR and deal with the rebase rather than asking you to fix our own problem.

Sorry for the inconvenience and support as we learning through

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.