openschemas / specifications Goto Github PK

with spec-container as an example instance of that.

We should use the (in progress) validator from openschemas-python to validate submissions before adding them proper.

Updates to do: first we need to represent these relationships:

Thing > Hardware
Thing > OperatingSystem
Thing > SoftwareHost
Thing > ComputationalEnvironment 
          - has SoftwareHost (many) each of which...
            - runsOn Hardware
            - supports Virtualization
            - has OperatingSystem

Thing > Virtualization
        - isSupportedBy SoftwareHost

Thing > Virtualization > Hypervisor
Thing > Virtualization > Container
                         - has OperatingSystem
                         - buildFrom ContainerRecipe (sometimes)
                         - has SoftwareApplication (sometimes)
                         - has annotations

Thing > Virtualization > Container > ContainerImage > ContainerRuntime
Thing > CreativeWork > Collection > ContainerDistribution
                                    has Container (many)

I'm not deliving into Computational Environment, that's too large of a chunk to tackle right now.
It could be added as a parent node at some point.

• https://schema.org/keywords can be used to describe tags (and subtypes) for Containers
• https://schema.org/PropertyValue can be used for random properties that aren't added

Following the schema.org guidelines properties should start with lowercase, e.g. containerImage. This will also help distinguish the property from the type ContainerImage.

@vsoch - just took a quick look at containers, which is derived from softwareappliance but creates new properties instead of using the baseclass ones.

in schema.org new things should only add properties that are not in its parent classes.

perhaps its just a rendering thing in openschemas, but the way schema.org does it is kinda nice:

https://schema.org/SoftwareApplication

tells you which properties are specific to this thing, and which are derived from parents, grandparents, etc.,. this will make it easier to comment on specific properties that are being added for these classes.