mtgoncurve / mtgoncurve.com Goto Github PK

Osgir, the Reconstructor

Error running simulation for input: BadDeckcode( "Cannot find card named "Osgir, the Reconstructor" in collection", )

Currently: #T = -1 returns same results as #T = 0.
Desired functionality #T = -1 calculates for chance of having mana available 1 turn before CMC.

Can't see the backend code so don't know how mana dorks are being calculated when forced as a mana source, so this may be a bigger project to add functionality which allows for "playing" mana dorks.

Sigarda, Font of Blessings
Nissa, Resurgent Animist

Error running simulation for input: BadDeckcode( "Cannot find card named "Sigarda, Font of Blessings" in collection", )
Error running simulation for input: BadDeckcode( "Cannot find card named "Nissa, Resurgent Animist" in collection", )

The images contain references to P(mana|draw) but the text refers to P(mana|turn).

Something seems wrong (maybe user error!) I seem to only be able to get the site to return a probability of 100 or 0. Using chrome on win 11. Screenshot attached.

Hi, I have 2 questions about mtg on curve

First question is: lets say I load a 60 deck card and I have an "Expected lands in opening hand" of 2.71 but then I add 200 Mountains to it, and "Expected lands in opening hand" becomes 4.33
This seems like a bug, unless I'm misunderstanding the meaning of "Expected lands in opening hand", can you explain it?

Second question is: lets say I load another deck which contains 3 Wicked Wolf and given my current lands setup, the "P play" value is 12.9
Now I add 100 more forests to it, and the "P play" goes up to 20.5... is this really correct? With 100 extra cards in the deck one would assume now is near impossible for one of those 3 Wolves to show up by turn 4
Is this a bug or there is an explanation?

I'm not really sure if this is the best way to ask about it, and if this is something that I should be submitting a PR for somehow I am happy to spend some time figuring that out.

Pathways are currently accounted as colorless lands

Please

Hi, interesting project 👍

I was looking at an old white weenie deck,

https://mtgoncurve.com/?v0=eyJjb2RlIjoiNCBUdW5kcmEgV29sdmVzXG40IEJlbmFsaXNoIEhlcm9cbjQgTWVzYSBQZWdhc3VzXG4yIFBpa2VtZW5cbjQgV2hpdGUgS25pZ2h0XG40IFNhdmFubmFoIExpb25zXG4yIFNlcnJhIEFuZ2VsXG40IEhvbHkgU3RyZW5ndGhcbjQgU3Bpcml0IExpbmtcbjQgQ3J1c2FkZVxuNCBCbGVzc2luZ1xuMyBEaXZpbmUgVHJhbnNmb3JtYXRpb25cbjE3IFBsYWluc1xuIiwib25fdGhlX3BsYXkiOnRydWUsImluaXRpYWxfaGFuZF9zaXplIjo3LCJtdWxsaWdhbl9kb3duX3RvIjo1LCJtdWxsaWdhbl9vbl9sYW5kcyI6WzAsNSw2LDcsMV0sImNhcmRzX3RvX2tlZXAiOiIifQ%3D%3D#

which decided to take a slightly lower count of 17 white lands, but at the same time, take three Divine Transformations and two Serras as "end game" creatures in case the game would drag on.

So when using the calculator to figure out the question "is 17 lands the right number of lands for this kind of deck?" and "does it make any sense to have the two Serras in the deck with this little mana", there were two interesting questions that came up:

• the calculator shows that the probability of having 5 mana on turn 5 is 18.09%. What would the probability of having 5 mana on turn 6, or turn 7, etc. be? Or rather, the expected value of which turn one will have 5 mana available? In other words, maybe the calculator could display for each k, what is the expected turn number that the player will have k mana available?
• similarly, the probability to play Serra on turn 5 is shown to be 4.34%. So it is unlikely that Serra will appear on that turn, but what is then the expected value of the turn number that Serra Angel will come to play? (is it an expected turn 8 creature? Or an expected turn 15 creature? etc.) It might be interesting for the calculator to show for each card, the EV of which turn that card will first appear on board.

Cheers :)

Shouldn't moxes be part of the mana calculation?