Project abandoned? about moonsharp HOT 7 OPEN

Fair call out; I think I got demoralized last time I went up against the pull requests, given the two maintained versions. I will aim to look at some of the core patches in the next two weeks and see if I can contribute a release.

from moonsharp.

Cool, sounds similar to #317

from moonsharp.

@LimpingNinja we did many changes to the bytecode representation, changed some core classes to structs, reduced their runtime size, allocations and overall dramatically improved performance in WattleScript. Currently, we don't have the space to backport changes upstream (probably the scope of changes is at a scale that can't be backported anyway) but if anyone wants just to run a faster version of MoonSharp, we support Lua mode and are 99% backward compatible (just recompile scripts, bytecode will differ).

Some of the core changes:
https://github.com/WattleScript/wattlescript/blob/main/src/WattleScript.Interpreter/DataTypes/DynValue.cs
https://github.com/WattleScript/wattlescript/blob/main/src/WattleScript.Interpreter/DataTypes/Table.cs
https://github.com/WattleScript/wattlescript/blob/main/src/WattleScript.Interpreter/Execution/VM/OpCode.cs
https://github.com/WattleScript/wattlescript/blob/main/src/WattleScript.Interpreter/Execution/VM/Processor/Processor_InstructionLoop.cs

On top of that, WattleScript itself is a C#/JS flavor added to Lua, with some syntax-breaking changes. The language is roughly specified here: https://github.com/WattleScript/wattlescript/wiki/roadmap and here https://github.com/WattleScript/wattlescript/tree/main/src/WattleScript.Tests/EndToEnd/CLike/SyntaxCLike

from moonsharp.

Sounds nice, I've pulled it down and am going to test on my own project, are you planning on leaving LUA support at the current level or moving towards the next version?

from moonsharp.

@LimpingNinja the last two things I wanted to add were gradual typing and LSP for Wattle. We hit a major roadblock with the gradual typing implementation, that's why the last commit is from the previous year. I'm planning to take another shot at it when I feel confident enough about the topic - turns out there's a lot of literature about implementing dynamically typed languages but moving into gradual typing with an existing codebase is pretty hard.
Until that is resolved we have no plans to push for a higher LUA version. However, if you were to adopt Wattle in your project, we accept PRs (or it could be implemented upstream and we can backport the changes).

from moonsharp.