mit-crpg / beavrs Goto Github PK
View Code? Open in Web Editor NEWA two-cycle full-core PWR depletion benchmark based on a commercial nuclear power plant
A two-cycle full-core PWR depletion benchmark based on a commercial nuclear power plant
All temperatures are at 300K when this a HZP benchmark, so temperatures should be at 560 - 566K.
Water density is for 560K. If 300K is what we want, water density should be changed.
Also mats['Water SPN'] does not have a temperature specified.
I wonder if the water density is correct in the nozzle (source 63) because it doesn't take into account the volume of the instrument rod for the lower part and the steel rods above the rods in the upper part
also above the burnable absorber rods
I found https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0335/ML033530020.pdf for ref 15 used in source 64. Is it correct?
reading Table 2-3 of [15] it seems that region 1 an 6 have steel inside (respectively 0.1770 and 0.1720). Why is there only water in these parts in figs 32-35?also, lower nozzle seems to be more or less region 5 of Table 2-3 of [15] (according to elevation), for which steel fraction is 0.1439 and not 0.1720. Is 0.1720 really expected in source 64?
sorry for those questions. if they are not appropriate, just let me know.
Thanks for your questions about the compositions/densities in the nozzle/support plate region. The approximations used may be improved by accounting for the volume of the extra rod, differentiating the nozzle and support plate... But I'm not sure how much they are affecting the simulation results. Have you done any testing before?
Anyway, I'll leave this as another issue. Please go ahead if you are interested to make the changes to the openmc model, do some tests, and submit a PR.
Originally posted by @liangjg in #4 (comment)
In fig 9, external radius is guide tube at dashpot.
In fig 40, external radius is guide tube above dashpot for the zone described in fig 9.
is figure 9 wrong ?
Some assemblies with burnable poison rods in cycle 1 move to position with control rod for cycle 2 (N03->H02 for example).
I suppose that all burnable poison rods are removed from these assemblies. Is it correct?
Also, are all the burnable poison rods removed for from the non fresh assemblies ?
It seems that the formula page 145, (source 62) :
rho_Bh2o = h2o_dens / wB_Bh2o
is not correct (I use syntax of https://github.com/mit-crpg/BEAVRS/blob/master/models/openmc/beavrs/materials.py).
according to your sources it should be :
rho_Bh2o = h2o_dens/(1 - wB_Bh2o)
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
๐ Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
A PHP framework for web artisans
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐๐๐
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
Data-Driven Documents codes.
China tencent open source team.