meshplus / bitxhub Goto Github PK

Development Task

Enable pier to connect to each other.

Development Task

Router is responsible for add signatures to MerkelWrapper sent to piers.

Development Task

refactor some commands which return pretty json.

bitxhub client network

example:

Bug Report

Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!

1. What did you do?

Send tx to BitXHub.

2. What did you expect to see?

3. What did you see instead?

4. What version of BitXHub are you using? (bitxhub version on BitXHub)

$ bitxhub version

BitXHub version: 1.0.0-rc1-master-e3a4b44
App build date: 2020-04-15T23:34:41
System version: darwin/amd64
Golang version: go1.13.8

Development Task

BitXHub can support encrypted IBTP payload in interchain transaction.

Bug Report

1. What did you do?

After i was testing for xvm contract, i want to invoke the inserted StoreContract like this:

2. What did you expect to see?

Contract invoke should return failed receipt.

3. What did you see instead?

Bitxhub got paniced.

4. What version of BitXHub are you using? (bitxhub version on BitXHub)

Commit hash: 9ae5793

Bug Report

build error

1. What did you do?

kaichen@Kais-MacBook-Pro bitxhub % bash scripts/prepare.sh ===> 1. Install packr go: finding github.com/meshplus/bitxhub-kit v0.0.0-20200329124935-585edb85ca63 go: github.com/meshplus/[email protected]: unknown revision 585edb85ca63 go: error loading module requirements ===> 2. Install golangci-lint go: finding github.com/meshplus/bitxhub-kit v0.0.0-20200329124935-585edb85ca63 go: github.com/meshplus/[email protected]: unknown revision 585edb85ca63 go: error loading module requirements ===> 3. Install go mock tool go: finding github.com/meshplus/bitxhub-kit v0.0.0-20200329124935-585edb85ca63 go: github.com/meshplus/[email protected]: unknown revision 585edb85ca63 go: error loading module requirements

2. What did you expect to see?

build success

3. What did you see instead?

error above

4. What version of BitXHub are you using? (bitxhub version on BitXHub)

master branch

Development Task

$ bitxhub client validators

Result:

[
    "0x123456789abcdef1"
    "0x123456789abcdef2"
    "0x123456789abcdef3"
    "0x123456789abcdef4"
]

Development Task

The script automatically installs the tmux based on the system type

go get github.com/securekey/fabric-examples/fabric-cli/cmd/fabric-cli

Bug Report

Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!

1. What did you do?

When I run make cluster, I found the error.

2. What did you expect to see?

3. What did you see instead?

$ tmux ls
no server running on /private/tmp/tmux-501/default


$ make cluster
===> Staring cluster
server exited unexpectedly
make: *** [cluster] Error 1

4. What version of BitXHub are you using? (bitxhub version on BitXHub)

$ bitxhub version

BitXHub version: 1.0.0-rc1-master-3d318a6
App build date: 2020-04-02T19:37:20
System version: darwin/amd64
Golang version: go1.13.8

Add interface to remove unused journals and consensus will decide which journals are unused.

Bug Report

Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!

1. What did you do?

Register rule with unexisted contract address

2. What did you expect to see?

The receipt of the tx should be Receipt_FAILED.

3. What did you see instead?

The receipt of the tx should is Receipt_SUCCESS.

=== RUN   TestTester/TestRegisterUnexistedWasmRuleShouldFail
    TestTester/TestRegisterUnexistedWasmRuleShouldFail: case008_rule_test.go:90: 
                Error Trace:    case008_rule_test.go:90
                Error:          Expected value not to be nil.
                Test:           TestTester/TestRegisterUnexistedWasmRuleShouldFail
    TestTester/TestRegisterUnexistedWasmRuleShouldFail: case008_rule_test.go:91: 
                Error Trace:    case008_rule_test.go:91
                Error:          Should be true
                Test:           TestTester/TestRegisterUnexistedWasmRuleShouldFail

4. What version of BitXHub are you using? (bitxhub version on BitXHub)

BitXHub version: 1.0.0-rc1-master-7a00eb3
App build date: 2020-07-27T14:05:37
System version: darwin/amd64
Golang version: go1.14.4

Golang version: go1.15.6
fabric 1.4.3
系统：腾讯云centos 7

根据快速开始教程到启动跨链网关部分，执行命令
bash fabric_pier.sh start -r '.pier' -c 'crypto-config' -g 'config.yaml' -p 8987 -b 'localhost:60011' -o 44555
报错：
appchain client create: create channel fabcli fail: event service creation failed: could not get chConfig cache reference: QueryBlockConfig failed: queryChaincode failed: Transaction processing for endorser [localhost:10051]: Endorser Client Status Code: (2) CONNECTION_FAILED. Description: dialing connection timed out [localhost:10051]

希望作者解答一下，谢谢

General Question

When I read the White-Paper, I found a question about the Pier design.
Compare with Cosmos and Plokadot, those design both ensure the protocol communicate with relay-chain directly, but Bitxhub use the Pier to achieve this.

I wonder if the Pier is malicious, can relay-chain recognize this? Just by the source appChain's Merkle Proof? How about a Pier makes a fake proof?

In the section 5 of the White-Paper, has addressed the basic solution about prevent malicious Pier, but I'm doubt how can a dozen of Pires reach a agreement to confirm a transaction, by some consensus algorithm?

The ledger journals are used for ledger rollback in some cases.

Bug Report

Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!

1. What did you do?

执行bash fabric_pier.sh start -r '.pier' -c 'crypto-config' -g 'config.yaml' -p 8987 -b 'localhost:60011' -o 44555

2. What did you expect to see?

顺利部署跨链网关

3. What did you see instead?

cp: cannot stat '/root/goproj/src/github.com/meshplus/pier-client-fabric/build/fabric-client-1.4.so': No such file or directory

4. What version of BitXHub are you using? (bitxhub version on BitXHub)

BitXHub version: 1.0.0-rc1-HEAD-8d24681
App build date: 2020-11-18T14:58:03
System version: linux/amd64
Golang version: go1.14.2

others

补充，追了下fabric_pier.sh，是因为pier-client-fabric在make fabric1.4的时候没有生成.so动态链接库文件，生成的是fabric-client-1.4的可执行文件，继而看pier-client-fabric的Makefile，发现make fabric1.4压根儿也不会生成.so文件啊，*.go中也没import C，export func之类的。
你们的quick start demo根本无法跑通啊。

Use KV to store ledger instead of MPT tree

Bug Report

The Fabric-SDK-Go in the fabric-cli is not a stable version (https://github.com/securekey/fabric-examples/blob/master/fabric-cli/cmd/fabric-cli/go.mod)，which is incompatible with all stable versions of fabric-sdk. It's hard to modify to match current fabric networks.


v1.0.0-beta1 and v1.0.0-beta2 are both wrong.

1. What did you do?

Modify the version of fabric-sdk-go to v1.0.0-beta1, then start ffn.sh, install chaincode.sh.

2. What did you expect to see?

Everything goes well.

3. What did you see instead?

4. What version of BitXHub are you using? (bitxhub version on BitXHub)

v1.0.0-rc1

tester will depend on go-bitxhub-client. We should remove it.

Bug Report

1. What did you do?

Test tps of bitxhub.

2. What did you expect to see?

no error

3. What did you see instead?

too many open files error

4. What version of BitXHub are you using? (bitxhub version on BitXHub)

BitXHub version: 1.0.0-rc1-master-bedbc5b
App build date: 2020-06-23T20:47:38
System version: darwin/amd64
Golang version: go1.14.4

多机规范化部署的问题

在参考文档部 https://github.com/meshplus/bitxhub/wiki/BitXHub%E9%83%A8%E7%BD%B2%E6%89%8B%E5%86%8C

• 按照规范化bitxhub部署文档，在多机部署时，分别在内网的4台主机上下载bitxhub的二进制压缩包
• 然后依次修改各节点network.toml中的id、ip以及端口如下

id = 1 # self id
N = 4 # the number of cluster nodes

[[nodes]]
addr = "/ip4/0.0.0.0/tcp/4001/p2p/QmZZFk1Tj6p25ecz98SpyHxb6joDPxR3wVPptDwuc8fue1"
id = 1

[[nodes]]
addr = "/ip4/10.10.7.46/tcp/4001/p2p/QmNRgD6djYJERNpDpHqRn3mxjJ9SYiiGWzExNSy4sEmSNL"
id = 2

[[nodes]]
addr = "/ip4/10.10.7.48/tcp/4001/p2p/QmXmyw2usKApP6UyK3cHEJ1XvxxSa8kM2M3Q1T6fhdifs5"
id = 3

[[nodes]]
addr = "/ip4/10.10.7.51/tcp/4001/p2p/QmY21wH1M694j1JFEvwegyJz8h2VpaSeeqcwt2vUpxsFPt"
id = 4

• 各节点的bitxhub均启动成功,通过curl探测各节点的4001端口均可得到如下信息

/multistream/1.0.0

• 但是各个节点成功运行后，报错

ERRO[14:57:47.933] Connect failed                                error="failed to dial : all dials failed\n  * [/ip4/10.10.7.46/tcp/4001] failed to negotiate security protocol: connected to wrong peer" module=p2p node=2
ERRO[14:57:47.933] Connect failed                                error="failed to dial : all dials failed\n  * [/ip4/10.10.7.45/tcp/4001] failed to negotiate security protocol: connected to wrong peer" module=p2p node=1
ERRO[14:57:47.933] Connect failed                                error="failed to dial : all dials failed\n  * [/ip4/10.10.7.48/tcp/4001] failed to negotiate security protocol: connected to wrong peer" module=p2p node=3

不知是什么原因导致的，希望可以得到大佬指点迷津

Bug Report

1. What did you do?

Test the function named GetAccountBalance with illegal address like this:

	res, err = suite.client.GetAccountBalance("__ _~~+——*/")
	suite.NotNil(err)
	fmt.Println("res:" + string(res.Data))

2. What did you expect to see?

The error isn't nil and the res is nil.

3. What did you see instead?

    TestTester/TestGetAccountBalanceByWrongAddress: case001_chain_test.go:213:
        	Error Trace:	case001_chain_test.go:213
        	Error:      	Expected value not to be nil.
        	Test:       	TestTester/TestGetAccountBalanceByWrongAddress
res:{"type":"normal","balance":0,"contract_count":0,"code_hash":"0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"}

4. What version of BitXHub are you using? (bitxhub version on BitXHub)

Commit hash: 9ae5793

Development Task

Grpc gateway supports https.

Development Task

Use fabric-samples.tar.gz

General Question

在执行quick start的时候，执行到启动跨链网关这一步中的bash fabric_pier.sh start -r '.pier' -c 'crypto-config' -g 'config.yaml' -p 8987 -b 'localhost:60011' -o 44555命令时，总会出现：

也就是invoke bvm contract: send tx error: rpc error: code = Unavailable desc = connection error: desc = "transport: Error while dialing dial tcp [::1]:60011: connect: connection refused"
这样的错误，请问是什么原因呢？
这是四个节点的启动情况：

Bug Report

Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!

1. What did you do?

Update appchain meta invoking UpdateAppchain

2. What did you expect to see?

3. What did you see instead?

call error: wrong index, required 1, but 21791

4. What version of BitXHub are you using? (bitxhub version on BitXHub)

BitXHub version: 1.0.0-rc1-master-7f540fb
App build date: 2020-04-22T14:19:03
System version: linux/amd64
Golang version: go1.14.2

Bug Report

Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!

1. What did you do?

Run quick start.

2. What did you expect to see?

3. What did you see instead?

4. What version of BitXHub are you using? (bitxhub version on BitXHub)

BitXHub version: 1.0.0-rc1-master-a231a21
App build date: 2020-04-24T23:19:56
System version: darwin/amd64
Golang version: go1.13.8

Bug Report

Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!

1. What did you do?

Unit Test

2. What did you expect to see?

3. What did you see instead?

4. What version of BitXHub are you using? (bitxhub version on BitXHub)

$ bitxhub version
BitXHub version: 1.0.0-rc1-master-82a3ac1
App build date: 2020-05-25T14:58:45
System version: darwin/amd64
Golang version: go1.13.5

Development Task

Use a specific pier and pier-client-fabric version in quick start script

Bug Report

Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!

1. What did you do?

curl http://localhost:9091/v1/block?type=0&value=2

2. What did you expect to see?

3. What did you see instead?

4. What version of BitXHub are you using? (bitxhub version on BitXHub)

BitXHub version: 1.0.0-rc1-master-6e0d721
App build date: 2020-07-08T23:09:39
System version: darwin/amd64
Golang version: go1.14.2

Bug Report

Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!

1. What did you do?

make cluster

2. What did you expect to see?

3. What did you see instead?

4. What version of BitXHub are you using? (bitxhub version on BitXHub)

BitXHub version: 1.0.0-rc1-master-a231a21
App build date: 2020-04-24T23:19:56
System version: darwin/amd64
Golang version: go1.13.8

Development Task

When the destination chain doesn't exist，the ibtp should be a valid transaction.

Put transaction execution and ledger persistence in 2 different go routines.

Use journals to rollback ledger reversely.

General Question

I can not find scripts/script.sh with the command ./ffn.sh up.Anyone help?

General Question

When I tried to use it based on Quick Start. Because of the network, when executing the command: bash ffn.sh up, the Docker image could not be downloaded. It is recommended to indicate in the document that Docker can switch the mirror source, which is more user-friendly.
When the command bash chaincode.sh install is executed and the VPN is turned on (I can access google, but the speed is very slow), a long wait occurs, and the following error occurs eventually.

Some Advices

1. I recommend Bitxhub can be optimized for different network environments, and thus more suitable for Chinese developers and users.
2. In the wiki documentation, it seems that there is no documentation for pier cmd (such as pier --repo) and BitxHub cmd. Adding guidance may make getting started easier.
3. In the BitXHub white paper, it is mentioned that "To ensure the reliability of Piers, incentives and punishments are adopted.", I think it is possible to clarify how to implement rewards and punishments, which may improve the reliability of BitXHub.

Development Task

Add a command that queries ibtp by id.

bitxhub client ibtp get <ibtp-id>

General Question

I have implemented Fabric with GM crypto. If I want to use BitXhub for intercommunication, what modifications should I do?

Feature Request

Describe the feature you'd like:
Pier should verify the signature of blockheader from bitxhub before persisting.

Describe alternatives you've considered:
Lite module of Pier is responsible for synchronizing blockheader from bitxhub. But for now the blockheader is not verified.
The verification of signatures can be done with the help of out crypto module in bitxhub-kit project.

Bug Report

Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!

1. What did you do?

make cluster

2. What did you expect to see?

3. What did you see instead?

4. What version of BitXHub are you using? (bitxhub version on BitXHub)

BitXHub version: 1.0.0-rc1-master-a231a21
App build date: 2020-04-26T10:26:11
System version: darwin/amd64
Golang version: go1.14.2

Development Task

There are a series of subcommands about this task:

• 1. Transfer

Example:

bitxhub client tx send --path <private_key_path> --to 0x111111111 --amount 100

• 2. Invoke contract

Example:

bitxhub client tx invoke --path <private_key_path> --to <contract_address> --function get --params string,arg1 --params uint64,arg2

Bug Report

Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!

1. What did you do?

make cluster

2. What did you expect to see?

3. What did you see instead?

4. What version of BitXHub are you using? (bitxhub version on BitXHub)

$ bitxhub version
BitXHub version: 1.0.0-rc1-master-e3a4b44
App build date: 2020-04-16T00:26:44
System version: darwin/amd64
Golang version: go1.13.8

Bug Report

Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!

1. What did you do?

2. What did you expect to see?

3. What did you see instead?

4. What version of BitXHub are you using? (bitxhub version on BitXHub)

$ bitxhub version
BitXHub version: 1.0.0-rc1-master-71e4cd0
App build date: 2020-04-09T19:28:57
System version: darwin/amd64
Golang version: go1.13.8

Bug Report

Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!

1. What did you do?

Send tx with wrong private key's signature , but not.

2. What did you expect to see?

The receipt of the tx should be Receipt_FAILED.

3. What did you see instead?

The receipt of the tx should is Receipt_SUCCESS.

=== RUN   TestTester/TestTXWrongSigPrivateKey
    TestTester/TestTXWrongSigPrivateKey: case009_transaction_test.go:82: 
                Error Trace:    case009_transaction_test.go:82
                Error:          Should be true
                Test:           TestTester/TestTXWrongSigPrivateKey
--- FAIL: TestTester (17.20s)

4. What version of BitXHub are you using? (bitxhub version on BitXHub)

BitXHub version: 1.0.0-rc1-master-7a00eb3
App build date: 2020-07-27T14:05:37
System version: darwin/amd64
Golang version: go1.14.4

请问bitxhub框架如何保证跨链操作的原子性，我在白皮书中没有看到关于跨链原子性方面的描述？

Development Task

Add validator engine for validating interchain transaction with self-defined rules.

Bug Report

Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!

1. What did you do?

Register rule with unexisted appchain id

2. What did you expect to see?

The receipt of the tx should be Receipt_FAILED.

3. What did you see instead?

The receipt of the tx should is Receipt_SUCCESS.

=== RUN   TestTester/TestRegisterUnexistedAppchainShouldFail
    TestTester/TestRegisterUnexistedAppchainShouldFail: case008_rule_test.go:106: 
                Error Trace:    case008_rule_test.go:106
                Error:          Expected value not to be nil.
                Test:           TestTester/TestRegisterUnexistedAppchainShouldFail
    TestTester/TestRegisterUnexistedAppchainShouldFail: case008_rule_test.go:107: 
                Error Trace:    case008_rule_test.go:107
                Error:          Should be true
                Test:           TestTester/TestRegisterUnexistedAppchainShouldFail

4. What version of BitXHub are you using? (bitxhub version on BitXHub)

BitXHub version: 1.0.0-rc1-master-7a00eb3
App build date: 2020-07-27T14:05:37
System version: darwin/amd64
Golang version: go1.14.4

General Question

In quick start ,when i execute to bash chaincode.sh install , it says that:

and in https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric-sdk-go/ it says that :

and i opened chaincode.sh , when executed to go get "github.com/securekey/fabric-examples/fabric-cli/cmd/fabric-cli",it said that:

what should i do