Updating EPSG database about proj4j HOT 6 CLOSED

Answer to the second question: I think it's acceptable to update the value to whatever value is returned by the new EPSG database (whether from proj4J itself, or some other source). Hopefully it is now correct! (Would be interesting to know why it has changed...)

Also, if the new value is simply less precise, perhaps the test precision should be reduced. (It's always a bit hard to figure out how values should be treated for the more obscure projections).

from proj4j.

For #1 - @lossyrob any ideas

from proj4j.

It seems like the epsg and world files in the nad folder are the two things that could use an update, and they come directly from proj.4. If the proj.4 project is, overall, MIT licensed, would it work to just put a reference in LICENSE to proj.4 and that it's MIT? If that sounds good, I can add that and update those two files.

from proj4j.

@willcohen yes, updating the database and changing any tests that had previous 'incorrect' values (according to the new DB params) makes a lot of sense. Thanks!

from proj4j.

Thanks, just submitted! Also -- for what's it worth, there did seem to be Eclipse IP validation hooks when I submitted PRs #2 and #3, though #7 didn't get one just now.

from proj4j.

Closed by #7

from proj4j.