[fr] Incorrect grammar analysis for some nouns incorrectly identified as verbs about languagetool HOT 5 OPEN

Oh, ok, perfect then!

I noticed multiple improvements that were needed on that part and I see that rules are quite easy to write. That should make some rules way more accurate. But I understand the concern about the fact that the sentence can contain mistakes and, thus, the disambiguation could lead to misinterpretation. However, I'm quite confident that I can get good results. I'm gonna try and open a few MRs if you're ok. I will probably need a few trial and error to get something consistent, though.

from languagetool.

I noticed a few more examples:

"Il prend café"

There is no way that café could be an adjective. There is not even a single name in the sentence...

"Il prend pelle"

How can a conjugated verb follow a conjugated verb that is not an auxiliary? What could be the subject of "V sub pres 1 s"? That doesn't seem to make any sense.

from languagetool.

In the first sentence, équipes is disambiguated correctly as a noun:

<S> Je[je/R pers suj 1 s] veux[vouloir/V ind pres 1 s] mieux[mieux/A] faire[faire/V inf] travailler[travailler/V inf] les[le/D e p,les/_GN_FP] équipes[équipe/N f p,équipes/_GN_FP] de[de/P] développement[développement/N m s] et[et/C coor] de[de/P] production[production/N f s,</S>]<P/>

from languagetool.

Interesting. It probably evolved recently I guess. The other 2 are still valid concerns, though.

from languagetool.

The words in the sentences start with all the tags present in the dictionary. Then, in disambiguation.xml, we select some tags. But this is a difficult process. It is even more difficult with sentences that can contain errors.
In general, we do the minimal disambiguation necessary to make the grammar rules work well.
If you really need to disambiguate those cases for some grammar rules, we can try to improve the disambiguation rules. But if it is not needed, we will not invest time on this.

from languagetool.