jilv220 / bb_rpb_tsl Goto Github PK

Hello there,
While examining the backtests, I saw a value that I could not understand.

For example: https://github.com/jilv220/BB_RPB_TSL/blob/master/backtest_result_v105/20211001-1031.txt

The results of this test show the number of max_open_trades as 102. I couldn't make sense of this value. Isn't that a very high?

Can you share the configuration file of these tests?

Can you please tell me if you are still using "max_open_trades": 5 ?
In your backtests results v103 and v104 I see "Max open trades = 86, 97, etc..." how is it possbile if you are using "max_open_trades": 5 in your conifg.json?

Thanks

Hi,
this is a wonderful strategy. thanks for sharing it for free.

im a noob in python, is there an update that would support short(futures) in binance? thanks

https://www.tradingview.com/v/RpYoQCVJ/

BB_RPB_TSL.py works beter in binance then BB_RPB_TSL_BI.py according backtest.
Is that correct?

Why not buying 2021/11/20 ?

Hi, I was trying BB_RPB_TSL.py with Kucoin as exchange, but I'm getting this warning constantly:

freqtrade | 2022-01-10 06:11:50,256 - freqtrade.exchange.common - WARNING - _async_get_candle_history() returned exception: "kucoin GET https://openapi-v2.kucoin.com/api/v1/market/candles?symbol=LTC-USDT&type=1day&startAt=1641427200&endAt=1684627200 429 Too Many Requests {"code":"429000","msg":"Too Many Requests"}"
freqtrade | 2022-01-10 06:11:50,257 - freqtrade.exchange.common - WARNING - retrying _async_get_candle_history() still for 4 times
freqtrade | 2022-01-10 06:11:50,258 - freqtrade.exchange.common - WARNING - Kucoin 429 error, avoid triggering DDosProtection backoff delay. 3 tries left before giving up

I've increased the Rate Limit from default (50) to 3100 under exchange.ccxt_async_config.rateLimit, but the warning persist.

Is this normal and I'm just have to ignore it?

Thanks in advance for your help!

Huge Thanks for your work!
I just wanted to ask about differences in:
BB_RPB_TSL,
what is _RNG and _TBS ?

Hello,

Can you please let me know what pairlist list have you used in your backtest_result_v103 testing results?

Thanks!