While working on #33 I noticed some inconsistencies in ending a tag option and proceeding to the next one:

• in OPTION_STATE_VALUE, a trailing space is mandatory to detect the end of the value
• in OPTION_STATE_QUOTED_VALUE, a peek-ahead is done to make sure a space (or end of tag content) comes next. If there is any other character, a ParserException is thrown and caught and all options will be interpreted as one.
• in OPTION_STATE_JAVASCRIPT however, there is no such check.
  A tag like [video js=javascript: ok();x=y] is considered valid.

I can make a pull request once #33 has been decided, so the merges will not conflict.

I would also like to add single-quoted values ([tag opt='use " in here without problem']) and possibly backslash-escaping ([tag opt="this: \" is a double quote"]).

Another problem is using ] in a (quoted) tag option. Due to the current parser implementation this is impossible.
After all, the parser is not a complete DFSM since the tokenizer only knows [, ], and everything else as tokens.

Just a suggestion about the examples on the web page, you should at least add the following notes to them as general recommendations.

1. Before calling parse(..) it might be a good idea to use something like htmlspecialchars($text, ENT_COMPAT, 'UTF-8');
2. Consistently using double quotes in your html replacements when adding bbcodes (in conjunction with previous) will provide at least rudimentary XSS protection.

I know security can be seen as somewhat non-issue for a middleware like jbbcode, however, ideally the concept of {option} and {param} could be enhanced/expanded to allow things like {attribute} etc. with some limits, or at the very least allowing users to externally specify the default CodeDefinition to use for bbcode's added via addBBCode.

Yes it is possible of course by deriving Parser and re-implementing addBBCode, but a geniune interface for it would be nicer.

Code definition from example to [color] with OptionValidator

$builder = new CodeDefinitionBuilder('color', '<span style="color: {option}">{param}</span>');
$builder->setUseOption(true)->setOptionValidator($CssColorValidator);

Here is text with invalid option in [color]

[b] bold text
  [color=!nvaL!d_color]
    [u] must be underline[/u]
  [/color]
[/b]

Result is

<b> bold text
[color=!nvaL!d_color] [u] must be underline [/u] [/color]
</b>

En el archivo

Deprecated: strlen(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in ...\JBBCode\Tokenizer.php

Una posible solución fue añadir esto if($str == NULL) return; sobre dicha línea mencionada!

As said above:

I´m trying to use a "quote" CodeDefinition that can be used with or without option!
Both work, but when I want to use other jBBCode tags inside the option parameter of the quote tag, the first tag in the option loses its opening bracket and the parser can`t recognize the quote tag itself because of it!

E.G:
[quote=[b]test[/b]]testing[/quote]

Output:
[quote=b]test[/b]]test123[/quote]

I tried using quotation in the option, but it was the same result!

Anyone got an idea how I could fix/make a workaround for this?

I have set definitions to parse BBC for table as:

    //table
    $builder = new \JBBCode\CodeDefinitionBuilder('table', '<table><tbody>{param}</tbody></table>');
    array_push($this->definitions, $builder->build());

    //thead
    $builder = new \JBBCode\CodeDefinitionBuilder('th', '<th>{param}</th>');
    array_push($this->definitions, $builder->build());

    //tr
    $builder = new \JBBCode\CodeDefinitionBuilder('tr', '<tr>{param}</tr>');
    array_push($this->definitions, $builder->build());

    //td
    $builder = new \JBBCode\CodeDefinitionBuilder('td', '<td>{param}</td>');
    array_push($this->definitions, $builder->build());

It forks fine except it requires all BBC in a table to be in single line. If any part of table is split to new line, empty line will be inserted on top of rendered TABLE.

When dealing with tables it is necessary to split table to several lines and even make indentation for elements to make it readable.

Is there a way to clean all new lines and spaces outside of TR and TD tags within a TABLE?

Hi,
i made 2 custom class code definitions, but the problem came when this two tags used in nested each other.

If color tag put in size tag, color won't be parsed, so it just produced like this :

xzc[color=#ff99ff]dsfd[/color]sfs

Sorry about my english.
Thank you.

class Size extends JBBCode\CodeDefinition {

    public function __construct()
    {
        parent::__construct();
        $this->setTagName("size");
        $this->setUseOption(true);
        $this->setParseContent(true);           
    }

    public function asHtml( JBBCode\ElementNode $el )
    {
        $ems=array(
            0.75
            ,0.95
            ,1.05
            ,1.45
            ,1.5
            ,2
            ,3
        );

        $content = "";
        foreach( $el->getChildren() as $child )
            $content .= $child->getAsBBCode();

        $attribute=abs(intval($el->getAttribute()));
        $attribute--;
        $em=isset($ems[$attribute]) ? $ems[$attribute] : $ems[2];

        return '<span style="font-size:'.$em.'em !important;">'.$content.'</span>';
    }
}

class Color extends JBBCode\CodeDefinition {

    public function __construct()
    {
        parent::__construct();
        $this->setTagName("color");
        $this->setUseOption(true);
        $this->setParseContent(true);
    }

    public function asHtml( JBBCode\ElementNode $el )
    {
        $content = "";
        foreach( $el->getChildren() as $child )
            $content .= $child->getAsBBCode();

        $color=$el->getAttribute();

        return '<span style="color:'.$color.' !important;">'.$content.'</span>';
    }
}

Hello, it is possible to override the getAsText method by a custom CodeDefinition?

For example, i have my own Youtube CodeDefinition, and when i call Parser.getAsText(), instead to show the Youtube URL/ID, i want to have 'Youtube Video'.

I tried to add a new public asText() function in my Youtube CodeDefinition, returning 'Youtube Video', but doesn't work, so i think has to be implemented by modifing the core...

I've tried, and failed, so can you help me getting this done? Thank you.

EDIT: I got it working.

Here how i did, if someone need this functionality, or improve it

ElementNode.php : Replace function

public function getAsText() {
    if( $this->codeDefinition ){
        return $this->codeDefinition->asText( $this );
    }else{
        $s="";
    foreach($this->getChildren() as $child)
        $s .= $child->getAsText();
    return $s;
    }
}

CodeDefinition.php : Add function

/**
 * Accepts an ElementNode that is defined by this CodeDefinition and returns the content without markup of the element.
 * This can be overridden by a custom CodeDefinitions so that the content can be directly manipulated.
 * 
 * @param el the element to return a text only representation of
 * 
 * @return the parsed text without markup of this element (INCLUDING ITS CHILDREN)
 */  
public function asText( ElementNode $el )
{
        $s="";
    foreach($el->getChildren() as $child)
        $s .= $child->getAsText();
    return $s;
}

and inside your custom CodeDefinition class, add:

...    

public function asText( JBBCode\ElementNode $el )
{
    return 'Your Custom Text';
}

...

I'm testing it right now to see if there are issues.

[url=http://lostpix.com/?v=2018-02-04_qa1th9680k10zvlhcm8qr6zkt.png][img]http://lostpix.com/thumbs/2018-02/04/qa1th9680k10zvlhcm8qr6zkt.png[/img][/url]

<a href="http://lostpix.com/?v"><img src="http://lostpix.com/thumbs/2018-02/04/qa1th9680k10zvlhcm8qr6zkt.png" alt=""></a>

i'm enjoying jbbcode :)

i just had to hack the core for my needs to do some replacements on plain text. i had to parse such plain text to put in smileys and do some automagic link creation stuff.

for such i had to change TextNode like this:

    /**
     * Returns the text string value of this text node.
     *
     * @return string
     */
    public function getValue()
    {
        // I know, it hurts ...
        if ( get_class($this->getParent()) == 'JBBCode\DocumentElement' )
        {
            return nl2br(autoLinkUsers(parseSmileys($this->value)));
        }
        else
        {
            return $this->value;
        }
    }

if there is a cleaner solution to do this i would like to know. if not it may be good option to allow such stuff via an official api.

cheers,
alexander

It works with url bbcode like : [url=http://google.com]abc[/url]
But failed to work with [url='http://google.com']abc[/url]

The default url tag defintion ignores the https protocoll and set all urls to http. Escpecially for intern links on a website it's a problem, because all bbcode formatted texts link to http content and ignores if you are browsing the site via https.
Has anybody a quick solution for this problem?

The last release v1.2.1 was created in August 2013. On jbbcode.com v1.2.0 is called the "most recent version".

I've install jbbcode through composer and have to use dev-master#e38ee2110eea20bc3b63ea753f8d404cec87bbb5 as dependency to have the latest bugfixes and support for multiple parameters. This is annoying.

Would it be possible to create a new version? Imho it's time for v1.3. What do you think?

This could possibly address #4 and help with #9:

There is currently no good way to cleanly split the content of a TextNode into serveral nodes after parsing. Doing so is vital when dealing with smileys and/or standalone links as they are likely to clash when it comes to processing them through dedicated filters. and masking them later through the HTMLSafeVisitor. A rather pain-free approach would be to allow TextNodes themselves have children, which would involve:

1. moving the appropriate logic out of ElementNode into Node;
2. allow TextNodes to be split at arbitrary positions through a public method (e.g.: TextNode.insertNodeAt(int $position, Node $node[, int $length=1])

A welcome side-effect were that DocumentNode could extend either TextNode or even Node directly instead of being a descendant of ElementNode.

Yes it's easy to create bb-codes for table [table], [th], [tr], [td] with CodeDefinitionBuilder like this

//table
$builder = new CodeDefinitionBuilder('table', '<table>{param}</table>');
array_push($this->definitions, $builder->build());

//thead
$builder = new CodeDefinitionBuilder('th', '<th>{param}</th>');
array_push($this->definitions, $builder->build());

//tr
$builder = new CodeDefinitionBuilder('tr', '<tr>{param}</tr>');
array_push($this->definitions, $builder->build());

//td
$builder = new CodeDefinitionBuilder('td', '<td>{param}</td>');
array_push($this->definitions, $builder->build());

But how to create definitions to parse [tr] only if it's inside [table][/table], and parse [td] if it's inside [tr][/tr]

Any solutions?

Hi,

I've found a bug while parsing a [ bracket inside a tag e.g. [b]:-[ [/b]. I've written 3 tests to specify the error. You can find them in this commit.

    public function testBracketInTag()
    {
        $this->assertProduces('[b]:-[[/b]', '<strong>:-[</strong>');
    }

    public function testBracketWithSpaceInTag()
    {
        $this->assertProduces('[b]:-[ [/b]', '<strong>:-[ </strong>');
    }

    public function testBracketWithTextInTag()
    {
        $this->assertProduces('[b]:-[ foobar[/b]', '<strong>:-[ foobar</strong>');
    }

As you can see the test testBracketInTag() works fine. The other tests testBracketWithSpaceInTag() and testBracketWithTextInTag() fails with something like <strong>:-[ /b]</strong>.

Here is the result of running the tests:

$ phpunit .
PHPUnit 4.0.17 by Sebastian Bergmann.

..........................................FF.................

Time: 208 ms, Memory: 2.75Mb

There were 2 failures:

1) SimpleEvaluationTest::testBracketWithSpaceInTag
Failed asserting that two strings are equal.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ @@
-'<strong>:-[ </strong>'
+'<strong>:-[ /b]</strong>'

[...]jBBCode/JBBCode/tests/SimpleEvaluationTest.php:28
[...]jBBCode/JBBCode/tests/SimpleEvaluationTest.php:99

2) SimpleEvaluationTest::testBracketWithTextInTag
Failed asserting that two strings are equal.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ @@
-'<strong>:-[ foobar</strong>'
+'<strong>:-[ foobar/b]</strong>'

[...]jBBCode/JBBCode/tests/SimpleEvaluationTest.php:28
[...]jBBCode/JBBCode/tests/SimpleEvaluationTest.php:104

FAILURES!
Tests: 61, Assertions: 99, Failures: 2.

I haven't take a look in the code so far. Is there a chance for a quick bugfix?

I need a number validator(for a [size] tag).

I would be very nice to be able to do a simple setOptionValidator('is_numeric');

rather than having to wrap is_numeric() inside a class just to use it in this context

class sizeValidator implements \JBBCode\InputValidator
{
    public function validate($input)
    {
        return is_numeric($input)
    }
}

setOptionValidator(new sizeValidator());

Would also allow for anonymous function as argument

setOptionValidator(function($input) { return is_numeric($input) });

The SCEditor creates a tag such as [font=Comic Sans MS], the jBBCode parser however only returns Comic as the attribute.

Also when adding quotes it only returns Comic.

Hello guys,

I used same code like from site :

$message = $_POST['message'];

//bbcode
$parser = new JBBCode\Parser();
$parser->addCodeDefinitionSet(new JBBCode\DefaultCodeDefinitionSet());

$builder = new JBBCode\CodeDefinitionBuilder('img', '<img style="max-width:700px;" src="{param}">');
$parser->addCodeDefinition($builder->build());
$builder = new JBBCode\CodeDefinitionBuilder('code', '<pre>{param}</pre>');
$builder->setParseContent(false);
$parser->addCodeDefinition($builder->build());

$parser->parse($message);
$mbb = $parser->getAsHtml();`

And when i insert some text in table i cant see HTML code..
Something like :

Result is only:Lorem..

Any help?

Hi,

i want to creade BBCode which looks like this:

[insertimg imgid=22 style=left border=1 alt="alttext"]

Point is, instead of image url, i need image id so I can buildimage name (finally, I should read image info from database) and provide proper HTML markup to show that image.

I made more or less everything that I needed except, i cannot use this BBCode without closing tag [/insertimg]. i want to get rid of that closing tag. I read all I could and searched for answer but could not get it.

Basicaly, now I have to put tag in this form:
[insertimg imgid=22 style=left border=1 alt="alttext"][/insertimg]
but i want it to be simpler, this form:
[insertimg imgid=22 style=left border=1 alt="alttext"]

Here is my code:

class bbcInsertImg extends \JBBCode\CodeDefinition {



  public function __construct()  {
    $this->parseContent = false;
    $this->useOption = true;
    $this->setTagName('insertimg');
    $this->nestLimit = -1;
  }

  public function asHtml(\JBBCode\ElementNode $pElement) {

  $m_attributes = $pElement->getAttribute();

    if (isset ($m_attributes['imgid'])) {
      $img_url = $m_attributes['imgid'] . '.jpg';
    } else {
      $img_url = '';
    }

    $bodyHtml = '<img src="' . $img_url . '"';

    $bodyHtml .= $this->AttribToHTML($pElement, 'style');
    $bodyHtml .= $this->AttribToHTML($pElement, 'border');
    $bodyHtml .= $this->AttribToHTML($pElement, 'alt');    

    $bodyHtml .= '>';    

    return $bodyHtml;

  }

  private function AttribToHTML($pElement, $pAttrib, $pDefaultValue = '') {

    $m_attributes = $pElement->getAttribute();

    if (isset ($m_attributes[$pAttrib])) {
      $m_result = ' ' . $pAttrib . '="' . $m_attributes[$pAttrib] . '"';
    } else {
      if (strlen ($pDefaultValue) > 0) {
        $m_result = ' ' . $pAttrib . '="' . $pDefaultValue . '"';      
      } else {
        $m_result = '';
      }
    }
    return $m_result;
  }

}

I found out that if I split long BBCode tag into several lines, jBBCode cannot parse properly.

I fixed it by simple change in Tokenizer.php

On line 31 there is a command:
array_push($this->tokens, substr($str, $strStart, $index - $strStart));

Replace it with:
array_push($this->tokens, trim(preg_replace('/\s+/', ' ', substr($str, $strStart, $index - $strStart))));

And that is all. After this fix you can split tag into several lines.

I hope someone could add this fix into the git source. I do not use git.

When someone enters for example

[ ABC ] 

the parser outputs this:

Notice: Uninitialized string offset: 0 in jBBCode\Parser.php on line 569

Notice: Uninitialized string offset: 0 in jBBCode\Parser.php on line 576

Hello,

Would it be possible to replace all newlines with linebreaks? I load submitted content through this parser, but by default all the newlines submitted by users are ignored. To display them via HTML they must be replaced with
's

http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.nl2br.php could be used for this.

e.g. Add above https://github.com/jbowens/jBBCode/blob/master/JBBCode/Parser.php#L156
$str = nl2br($str);

However my PHP isn't all that great so there may be better ways to do this.

EDIT: I added it in a pull request.... First time I've done this hope I'm not messing things up lol :)

Seems that italic, bold is parsed on [code], can be excluded somehow ?

If an unclosed bbcode appears within an element defined by a code definition that disallows parsing of its contents, the getAsBBCode output will close the unclosed bbcode. There is a test in ParseContentTest.php that illustrates this bug.

/**
 * Tests that when a tag is not closed within an unparseable tag,
 * the BBCode output does not automatically close that tag (because
 * the contents were not parsed).
 */
public function testUnclosedTag() {

    $parser = new JBBCode\Parser();
    $parser->addCodeDefinitionSet(new JBBCode\DefaultCodeDefinitionSet());
    $parser->addBBCode('verbatim', '{param}', false, false);

    $parser->parse('[verbatim]i wonder [b]what will happen[/verbatim]');
    $this->assertEquals('i wonder [b]what will happen', $parser->getAsHtml());
    $this->assertEquals('[verbatim]i wonder [b]what will happen[/verbatim]', $parser->getAsBBCode());
}

Currently parseContent is a misnomer. jBBCode actually constructs a parse tree of a node's children regardless of the parseContent property. parseContent currently only affects how getAsHTML recurs (whether it calls getAsHTML on the children or getAsBBCode.

The parser should be updated to actually avoid parsing the contents of elements when parseContent is false.

What about to create unparse method to replace html-tag pairs from "Code Definition Set" to BB-codes?
For example I'am parsing text to html before saving it to DB.
If i want to edit saved text, i need to store 2 versions of text in DB - parsed (getAsHtml()) and unparsed (getAsBBCode())

You may want to include a note that the particular variant of MIT license you use may also be referred as the Expat License. Or specifically state MIT license as listed by the OSI to resolve any ambiguity.

I have seen both the Expat and X11 licenses referred as the MIT License, Expat seems to be the more common one as well as also the one used by OSI under the name MIT license.

I know the text is on the page, but when searching information on compatible licenses your license may be listed under Expat instead, as is done by f.ex. GNU.

Reference:
http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Expat
http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:X11

Enhancement suggestion: Support for list tags [li] and its various attributes as well a [*] which indicated each new list item.

Or is this currently possible some how?

Hola, estoy buscando una forma de poder codificar ya sea con urlencode o base64_encode, pero si uso una de las funciones me devuelve {option} y no la url que deseo.
¿Como puedo hacerlo?
=== Traduction ===
Hello, I'm looking for a way to be able to encode with either urlencode or base64_encode, but if I use one of the functions it returns me {option} and not the url that I want.
How can I do it?

Somewhat related to #40

Links and images can not be used with Protocol-relative URLs because FILTER_VALIDATE_URL is too strict.

"JavaScript:alert()" style URLs also will not work for this reason, tho that is probably for the best for safety reasons.

Hello,

I'm trying to put jBBCode into a project of mine. For that, the code I've written fetches data from a database and puts that code through jBBCode, however, jBBCode seems to ignore returns completely. So text written in separate paragraphs make just a single paragraph. Is there any way to put every block of text between the p-tag in HTML without users having to put additional BBCode in their comments?

Thanks in advance.

Just try your example.

$text = "The default codes include: [b]bold[/b], [i]italics[/i], [u]underlining[/u], ";
$text .= "[url=http://jbbcode.com]links[/url], [color=red]color![/color] and more.";

$parser->parse($text);

print htmlentities($parser->getAsHtml());

Generates The default codes include: <strong>bold</strong>, <em>italics</em>, <u>underlining</u>, <a href="http://jbbcode.com">links</a>, <span style="color: red">color![/color] and more.</span>

Currently, jBBCode makes no guarantees about consecutive, uninterrupted text being in the same text node. The parser will sometimes create adjacent text nodes. This isn't a problem, but it can make text manipulation through the NodeVisitor more difficult. It might be nice if after parsing, we traverse the graph and collapse adjacent text nodes into a single text node with the concatenated values.

This has bugged me for a while now: ParserException is by its semantics a clear candidate for inheriting from \DomainException (see also this SO discussion) instead of the generic \Exception.

However, given that ParserException is not exposed to any codepaths outside the parser, it would make sense to scrap it entirely and reduce the weight of the codebase. Any thoughts?

Right now you can enter arbitrary strings as the color for the default [color] bbcode. This could allow arbitrary CSS styles to be applied or worse, arbitrary javascript to be executed on an event. The [color] bbcode needs an InputValidator for its color option.

There is a problem with the way that composer generates the autoload path for this class that causes the class to not be found.

Steps to reproduce:

1. Create a new/blank folder
2. Install jbbcode/jbbcode from pagagist via composer-
   php composer.phar require jbbcode/jbbcode
3. Create a simple index.php

    include 'vendor/autoload.php';
    $parser = new JBBCode\Parser.php;

4. Load the file, see the error:
   Fatal error: Class 'JBBCode\Parser' not found in /home/user/html/test/index.php on line 4

I played around with it a bit and I was able to fix it by creating a subfolder to the install folder called JBBCode and moving all of the files except composer.json there.
IE:

vendor/
    jbbcode/
         jbbcode/
              composer.json
              JBBCode/
                    Parser.php
                    ...

I can't figure out why this is, since psr-0 seems to suggest that the files should go in the vendor/jbbcode/jbbcode folder. Any way you slice it, though, something is funky.

How to define for example the tag [hr] to replace with

I installed the (newly refreshed) v1.2.0 of JBBCode from packagist in my instance of Laravel via composer. It appeared to install correctly, but I am unable to instantiate the parser (or any other) of the classes in the JBBCode namespace.

My vendor/composer/autoload_namespaces.php file appears correct:

    return array(
        'JBBCode' => array($vendorDir . '/jbbcode/jbbcode'),
    );

My instantiation in a controller is just:

    $parser = new JBBCode\Parser();

I consistently get an error of "Class 'JBBCode\Parser' not found"

I don't appear to be doing anything else weird or wrong. Have you tested this against a Laravel install?

Is there a way to change the value of the option

Example:
I am using SCEditor to create my BBCode. In the editor it has font size which is create a bbcode tag of
[size=4]this is font size 4 ie 18px [/size]

Now I want JBBCode to read the 4 and then validate it, and then return the correct font size value in the validation function which is then placed in the html render.
eg.

style="font-size:18px">this is font size 4 ie 18px

However I keep getting

style="font-size:4px">this is font size 4 ie 18px

How do I change the option value for a new value.

I am using JBBCode to read this size using...
$builder = new CodeDefinitionBuilder('size', '

{param}

My fontValidator is...
public function validate($input)
{
if (is_numeric($input) && $input <= 7 && $input >= 1) {
switch ($input) {
case 1:
return 10;
break;
case 2:
return 13;
break;
case 3:
return 16;
break;
case 4:
return 18;
break;
case 5:
return 24;
break;
case 6:
return 32;
break;
case 7:
return 48;
break;
}
} else {
return 16;
}
}

Thank you so much if you help me

When using the DefaultCodeDefinitionSet the following does not work: [url=www.google.com]www.google.com[/url]. This is not unreasonable since it is technically not a valid URL, however most users will expect this to work. It may be fruitful to include a mechanism where it can default to the http:// schema when none is found.

This issue has been raised on behalf of https://github.com/r04r/Minichan/issues/21.

Hi. Hope that great project is still maintained...
I was hopping to add a support for multiple tag options, specifically for img ALT text in format of:
[img alt="text" width="100" height="200"]url[/img]

Defined CodeDefinition class and start playing with the code.
Unfortunately the parser didn't get to my code since the tag name is assumed to be up to the "]" character or the "=" where the assumption is that the format will always be [tag=option].
/* There could be an attribute. */
$tagPieces = explode('=', $tagContent);
$tmpTagName = $tagPieces[0];

Before I deep dive into the parser code...
Is there anything that was already done in that direction?

Thanks.

I have some html with javasript tag

<script> var i = 1; var arr = [1,2,3] var failed_variable = arr[i]; // this was replaced with arr<em> </script>

How to skip this replacion?

The methods incrementCounter(), decrementCounter(), resetCounter(), and getCounter() have been marked as deprecated for quite some time now and as far as I can tell, they are no longer touched by any code paths and are skewing code coverage statistics. I'd like to see them either removed or added to the code coverage blacklist. Thoughts?

Also, there's still setUseOption() and setParseContent(): These two do alter the behaviour of a CodeDefinition but are likewise marked as deprecated. What about them?

I needed list of all code definitions Parser can handle, but could not find a way to get it.

I suggest expanding class Parser with something like this:

public function getCodeDefinitions() {
  return $this->bbcodes;
}

It seems that some extended characters cause the whole things to fail without error and return null when calling getAsHtml();

For example: ’

hi
is there a way to load via composer?
thanks

Is there any way to get the option content in a self made codeDefinitionSet?

getAsBBCode() does not work for any code.

$parser->parse("<strong>wrgerege</strong>"); print($parser->getAsBBCode());

Hi,

I have created a class Definition_Video extending CodeDefinition to support the [video] tag. The Definition_Video parse urls from vimeo.com, dailymotion.com and youtube.com.

Now I want support the [youtube] tag for BC and I created the Definition_Youtube class:

class Definition_Youtube extends Definition_Video
{

    public function __construct()
    {
        parent::__construct();

        $this->setTagName('youtube');
    }

}

and add the classes to the parser.

$parser->addCodeDefinition(new Definition_Video());
$parser->addCodeDefinition(new Definition_Youtube());

This works fine for me, but I have a lot more tag aliases and have to create a lot of classes. I wish to do something like this:

$definition = new Definition_Video();
$defintion->addAliasTagName('youtube');

$parser->addCodeDefinition($definiton);

I have also seen the deprecated CodeDefinition::setTagName() method, that allows easy aliasing as well:

$definition = new Definition_Video();
$parser->addCodeDefinition($definiton);

$defintion->setTagName('youtube');
$parser->addCodeDefinition($definiton);

Is there a reason why CodeDefinition::setTagName() method is marked as deprecated? Or is it possible to add an aliasing funtionality?