jacklenox / susty Goto Github PK

With no widget area, the theme is screaming out for a site search field. If it's a non-fancy form field this shouldn't add more than a few bytes.

Why should this be added?

First, we want people to use Susty (I want to use it!), which means adding basic features such as this.

But, more importantly, having a direct search option is much better than users scrolling through to find something - again, a sustainability advantage here.

wouldn't a minified style.css shave off some more bytes? 😁

This is not common practice although I dont understand why.

At XWP our team has been working with the folks at Google on bringing AMP support to more WordPress themes.

I'm really curious about a version of Susty that could provide native AMP support. I've been using Susty for the past few months, and loving it!

I'm interested in making the web as light as possible. Are you still working on this or there any similar, but more up to date projects? Do there need to be? I'm concerned that something this old might not work with the most modern versions of WordPress or is that silly given that Susty is a such a lowest comment denominator project?

I recently found Delivering WordPress in 7KB and really like the theme for its low bandwidth and its minimal look. But there are spaces on either side of post types and also the Leave a Comment link. Were these intentional? I was looking to delete them but I haven’t found the line (not much of a coder in spite of the GitHub account).

Right now, Susty doesn't support Gutenberg-specific theme options (I'm mainly thinking of the wide and full width image options).

Some simple details on how they are added can be found here - https://www.elmastudio.de/en/get-your-wordpress-theme-gutenberg-ready/.

Now, this is going to add extra styling information to the front-end, so I'm wondering if it could be switchable, with a default of "off". This may be the longer term solution for more options in Susty to make it more palatable for people to use - for example, if a widget area is required to be included on wp.org, you could add it but have it switchable too. Back-end admin options won't impact front-end size either, although you can even make them theme code activated for now.

Gutenberg styling is the one thing that's stopping me from using Susty right now.

hello I love your theme but I would like to add a dynamic sidebar to the right of the content but I can't play with the css ...

Hi,

I'm using an adapted version of this theme for my blog, and I would like to use feature images on occasion. However, I've configured the theme to only have a list of post titles on the homepage, not the excerpt.

So I would like to have the feature image hidden on the homepage, but displayed when navigating to the actual post.

I imaging there's some jiggery pokery to be done in the template-tags.php file, but I can't work out what it is.

If someone could help, I'd be ever so grateful.

Thanks!

This is something I've noticed on my own Susty site and I can recreate on wpsusty.com too.

If you perform a site search for something that can't be found (e.g. https://sustywp.com/?s=plop) then you'll get the search bar twice (it doesn't happen when you try and invalid page - e.g. https://sustywp.com/dsffdf).

Can a customizer option be added so that the default SVG can be switched out for another?

Hi,

if you're just disabling the emoji.js inclusion, people with browsers / OSes / using base fonts not fully aware of or enabled to use the enhanced utf-8 codes will get ugly placeholder images instead, eg.

Example: https://gfx.fwolf.de/screenshots/emojis-are-ugly.png

So removing this for performance reasons is ok, but ONLY if done COMPLETELY.

This StackExchange answer details how to achieve that: https://wordpress.stackexchange.com/a/185578 ;)

Thanks in advance,
cu, w0lf.

Having trouble with my Susty child theme. It has been working OK for some time, but now breaks. This could be down to changes with WordPress.

My child theme has an empty .css file and ONLY this in Functions.php

`<?php
add_action( 'wp_enqueue_scripts', 'enqueue_child_theme_styles', PHP_INT_MAX);

function enqueue_child_theme_styles() {
wp_enqueue_style( 'parent-style', get_template_directory_uri().'/style.css' );
}
?>`

Any idea what is wrong?

This isn't a bug just wanted to say thanks for your effort. :)

I realize this may be low priority, but have you considered licensing your theme under AGPLv3 instead of GPLv2?

If you are concerned about distributing your theme with Wordpress's GPLv2 licensed code, it appears that since the GPLv2 allows you to use any later version of the license, and the GPLv3 is explicitly compatible with AGPLv3, you can upgrade GPLv2 to v3 and then distribute with AGPLv3 code. So I don't think there are any legal obstacles.

It seems to me that the AGPL is a better form of copyleft for code that is only served on a webpage, like a Wordpress theme, and never truly redistributed.

The susty theme is great. Please does anyone has a modified susty theme- containing a sidebar and a footer also, page navigation

I tried using a plugin but it would not work

Thanks

The automation for renewing the Let's Encrypt cert on sustywp.com appears to be broken, as the present certificate expired on 15 June.

Hey, how does the theme redirect all urls which start with /menu* to menu.php page?

Because I do have some posts with url of www.example.com/menuo-be-laiko/ and it redirects to /menu/ page? I can't seem to find any rules like that in functions.php or elsewhere?

Pagination is not working :(
404 issued instead

Found your theme for the site today
Put in the sandbox
But I don't understand where and what to change to display the word menu-in Russian?
http://prntscr.com/tm1rtg
thank

Could tag to allow for faster fetching of the package via composer?

I haven't tested this, so do forgive me but surely having individual files which only contain one function in an inc directory surely adds some HTTP overhead that can be saved, no?

Is this documented somewhere as it's something I've seen in a few WordPress themes and I'm curious as to why it's structured that way.

A quick dig through StackOverflow suggests the effects of including files is negligible but it would reduce the overall theme footprint. I'd like to read your thoughts on this.