Hi @milena-git and @mtennekes,
@MelineeTS and me are preparing the open sourcing of this project on behalf of the Insee.
I open this issue to discuss about the FOSS license.
@mtennekes: in 🇫🇷 , the FOSS licenses that we can use are limited by the law.
We can use one of the following licenses.
For the code, the permissive ones are:
- MIT
- Apache-2.0
- BSD-2-Clause
- BSD-3-Clause
- CECILL-B
For the code, the ones with a copyleft are:
- CECILL-2.1
- CECILL-C
- GPL-3.0-or-later
- LGPL-3.0-or-later
- AGPL-3.0-or-later
- MPL-2.0
For the datasets and the publications, we can use:
- ODbL-1.0
- etalab-2.0 (this is a 🇫🇷 governmental permissive license)
Even if the EUPL-1.2 is not listed here, we can consider it for the code.
The Insee encourages the use of the MIT licence but any of the above mentioned licenses would be correct.
@mtennekes , would you agree to release this conjoint code under the MIT license?