hudclark / grpc-nvim Goto Github PK

Hi!

Great plugin, it's very similar to this one: https://github.com/baverman/vial-http, which I use for REST APIs. Thank you for maintaining it.

I have one question though, I'm trying to figure out if I can use variables to not clutter my requests file, and to avoid hardcoding stuff. This is what I would like to do:

grpc -H "authorization: Bearer $ACCESS_TOKEN" -plaintext localhost:50051 position.Position.RecordPosition
{
    "lat": 1234,
    "long": 42
}

I tried many variants of this command with no success. ACCESS_TOKEN is an env var in this context, but I wouldn't mind if it was just one variable at the top of the file.
I really want to do that because I have many different requests using an access token, and hardcoding the token in each of them is not practical (the token changes regularly).

Is there a way to do that?

Hey @hudclark! How you doing?
I created a simple tree sitter grammar for *.grpc files.
I wanted to combine bash and json treesitter grammars but didn't find a way to do it. So I extended bash grammar and copied json into it. We can now use it for syntax highlighting and arguments parsing.

What do you think about it? Should we give a link to the grammar in readme?

Hey! Very like idea of the plugin, great job!
I'm using https://github.com/rest-nvim/rest.nvim for the similar purpose but for http requests.

I'm trying to get it working with Authorization header and get an error.
I'm executing :Grpc command on a line that looks like:
grpc -H "Authorization:Bearer blablabla" localhost:443 com.actions.v2.Service/List

And see output:

// grpcurl -H "Authorization:Bearer blablabla" localhost:443 com.actions.v2.Service/List
Too many arguments.
Try 'grpcurl -help' for more details.

However if I copy the first commented line from output and execute it in terminal I see the response.

Can we add a support for headers such headers?

Also would be cool to somehow specify this header only once and have it on every request. Can be done per buffer variables I think. So I would not have to specify this header on each query. What do you think?