Code Monkey home page Code Monkey logo

galaxy_zoo's Introduction

Galaxy_Zoo

Aim

In this project, I want to find a unsupervised way to seperate galaxies and stars. TODOs:

1.Use Galaxy Zoo data

VAE + HypCol vs. CNNs + surrogate class + HypCol

https://github.com/EdwardJKim/unsupervised-dl4astro/blob/master/notebooks/kmeans.ipynb

2.On SDSS datasets

gala.ipynb

on galaxy zoo dataset

SDSS.ipynb

on SDSS dataset

cutfigure.py

to cut figures of galaxy zoo dataset

SDSS_clustering.ipynb

use manifold learning method to imporve the accuracy of classification result. use both 2D and 3D hidden variables as inputs

TC(1).ipynb

use several different VAE structures to help clustering/hidden layer classification process

initial_normalization.ipynb

Kmeans clustering with the original normalization method(-mean,/max)

RepW4.ipynb

Report for week 4

some of the code is credit to Edward Kim:

https://github.com/EdwardJKim/unsupervised-dl4astro/

Find+physics_failed.ipynb

Compare size/luminosity of objects and the hidden variables

seems only one hidden variable is useful

can not use such hidden variables to predict the redshift

15epoch_3hidden_newone0808.h5

Model saved in Classification+result+is+better+when+I+use+5+channels.ipynb

Classification+result+is+better+when+I+use+5+channels.ipynb

A good Classification result with ROC curve

The overall acc reached 88.8%

Correct+normalization+%26+great+segmentation.ipynb

together with the saved parameters: Correct_normalization_great_segmentation0807.h5.zip

Only use the 4th channel (i channel) instead use all of the 5 channels in segmentation. Got much better result than before

RepW6_high_performance_result.ipynb,(1) is the most recent one

Reached the highest accuracy of 88.8%

Combined the results by Aug.8 image

Try_more_hidden_variables.ipynb

Better segmentation result when I use AE instead of VAE.(It should be like this)

and some result are saved in OneNote

A Pseudo Wasserstein loss.ipynb

The result here is pretty like when I used L2 regularizer

Accurate_KL_and_Pseudo_Wasserstein_loss.ipynb

Compared several reasonable loss functions.

I calculate those loss function using Mathematica. The .nb files are also uploaded

galaxy_zoo's People

Contributors

tensorstone avatar

Watchers

James Cloos avatar

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.