The WHO has published a template IG to be used in SMART related implementation guides: https://worldhealthorganization.github.io/smart-ig-starter-kit/instructions.html#country-adaptation-of-an-existing-guide

Following these instructions will ensure consistent styling and content structure to ease adoption of WHO's SMART Guidelines.

Should we use it as a template in our SMART IG?

Currently we present the example app launch with the AuditEvent resource.

The ExampleScenario would be a much better fit.

The container overflows on page https://hl7.fi/fhir/finnish-smart/1.0-rc2/AuditEvent-apotti-ehr-launch-by-practitioner.html.

This is due to an inline style changing the display of the div element surrounding the intro section to inline-block.

<div style="display:inline-block" markdown="1">

It's not immediately clear where this styling comes from and what would be the appropriate way to change or override it.

Josh Priebe from Epic here ([email protected]). I work with Apotti and with our Epic standards group.

Related to this section of the guide:

Why Do We Need to Profile the SMART Specification?
The SMART App Launch specification is already a globally applicable specification. The International Patient Access specification adds some more constraints and details to it. Do we really need something more?
We have found out that there are still some places in both of these specifications that allow some implementation feedom but may be tricky for app developers to support. In this implementation guide, we aim to provide clarity on topics like how an app best learns the organization or organization unit the practitioner launching the app works for (when launching the app).
We believe we can get some of these details sorted out more efficiently in the local Finnish context. We still aim to feed our learnings and developments with the wider SMART community and help get parts of them adopted to the SMART and IPA specifications.

After review, the view of Epic is there isn't enough difference to the Finnish local context here to warrant an entirely new FHIR specification for Finnish SMART. The requirements seem duplicative to the base FHIR and SMART requirements. Further drift from global standards will make support harder for global actors.

Rather, we recommend HL7.FI group should continue being an author and contributor to the global specifications being created.