The purpose of this experiment is to determine the curvature of the earth solely by mechanical measurement.
A neutrally buoyant fishing line should form a perfectly straight line when held under high tension in a long stretch of still water. If each end is at depth Y beneath the water surface S and we measure the depth Y + dY at the line's midpoint, then:
- dY > 0 implies convexity of S
- dY < 0 implies concavity of S
- dY = 0 implies flatness of S
- To make a floating line sink, decrease the water density by mixing in ethanol.
- To make a sinking line float, increase the water density by adding salt.
After the water has been calibrated, a change in temperature will cause it's density to change according to this table. In addition, evaporation of an ethanol solution may cause it's density to change although the effect is probably very small.
Water currents may be caused by convection due to temperature differences, surface wind and other disturbances. According to the idealised equations in flx-calc, the midpoint of a 1.2mm x 226m line at 1000N would be displaced 0.034mm in a slow prevailing current of 50mm/minute.
A line will stretch under tension (as determined by its Young's modulus) causing its density to reduce and its midpoint to rise. A stretched line will also tend to reduce its diameter (as determined by its Poisson ratio) causing its buoyancy to reduce and its midpoint to fall. The change in length and diameter must be accurately measured so the expected midpoint displacement can be calculated. To minimise the midpoint displacement, a line with minimal stretch should be chosen.
Material | density g/cm^3 | Young's modulus GPa | Elongation | Water absorption |
---|---|---|---|---|
nylon 6 | 1.12 - 1.14 | 2.3 - 2.5 | >15% | high |
Dyneema SK60 | 0.97 | [79][ref1] | 3 - 5% | near zero |
Dyneema SK71 | 0.97 | [123][ref1] | 3 - 5% | near zero |
Spectra A | 0.97 | [120][ref2] | 3.5% | near zero |
Spectra B | 0.97 | [170][ref2] | 2.7% | near zero |
[ref1]: http://www.toyobo-global.com/seihin/dn/dyneema/seihin/ | ||||
[ref2]: http://www.goodfellow.com/E/Polyethylene-UHMW.html |
A line with a smooth round exterior, such as nylon monofilament and small diameter dyneema lines like Berkley NanoFil unifilament, will be easier to measure against (both visually and with a micrometer) and less susceptible to water currents.
A quick proof of concept with a cheap Samsung NV30 digicam and a standard domestic ruler demonstrates reading precision to about +/- 0.25mm:
Greater precision should be possible with a microscope, and there are a number of high precision rulers available:
Ruler length | Graduations (mm) | URL |
---|---|---|
6" | 0.254 | http://www.geionline.com/rulers/general-purpose-inch-metric/2014a |
10mm | 0.10 | http://www.tedpella.com/tools_html/Micro-Tool-Measurement.htm |
50mm | 0.10 | https://www.pepleroptics.com/length-measuring/glass-measuring-ruler-peak-1972-series.html |
6" | 0.10 | http://www.maxlevy.com/product/EA018.html |
6" | 0.05 | http://www.maxlevy.com/product/EA017.html |
6" | 0.025 | http://www.maxlevy.com/product/EA016.html |
Parallax could be a major source of error.