• Fix "Links to cross-origin destinations are unsafe" -> Add rel="noopener" or rel="noreferrer" to any external links to improve performance and prevent security vulnerabilities.
• Fix "Buttons do not have an accessible name" -> https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/2.2/button-name
• Add a meta description, and FB/Twitter cards, to check use https://www.heymeta.com/url/factoriocheatsheet.com

https://github.com/deniszholob/factorio-cheat-sheet/blob/master/src/app/views/cheat-sheets/balancers/balancers.component.html#L3

should be https://wiki.factorio.com/Balancer_mechanics, not https://wiki.factorio.com/Balancer-mechanics.

Fix the research images, to point to correct urls from the wiki

Currently using angular-cli 1.X and current release is 7.X.

Notably, the modern CLI includes webpack which has more well maintained image optimization packages.

https://github.com/angular/angular-cli/releases

As in title.

Because of belt speed changes, it's likely that the furnace count needed to smelt a fully compressed belt is going to change too. Unless of course, the furnace recipes are going to be changed too. The nuclear processing section will likely also change.

From the Factorio forum from developer V453000, there is already a proposal for a smelting recipe change:

As the smelting recipe change, I am proposing the following:

• Iron plate, copper plate, stone brick: 3.2
• Steel: 16

That would mean exactly 48 stone furnaces per yellow belt, which is the number that people already build, but some of the last ones flicker with inactivity in 0.16, now all of them would work nonstop.

Source for furnace recipe change proposal: https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?t=64219#p392508

The icon shows 10,000 x uranium ore -> 7 x uranium-235, 993 x uranium-238.
Shouldn't this be 1000 x uranium ore?

There is a section on the cheat sheet giving ratios to convert everything into petroleum gas, those ratios will change in 0.17 according to FFF#275.

From FFF#275:

Coal liquefaction - very useful when you have a lot of coal but not enough oil. The Coal liquefaction recipe is also changed so it’s more useful - now it produces much more Heavy oil that you can crack into whatever you need, but produces less Light oil and Petroleum gas. If we cracked everything to petroleum, the maximum gain is almost doubled compared to 0.16.

Source: https://www.factorio.com/blog/post/fff-275

self explanatory from title

In Common Ratios Sheet:
Purple Science Pack Recipe in 0.16 no longer requires the assembly machine

Pretty sure it should be 1000, not 10000

In the train speed section there's a note saying that the ratio of 1 locomotive to 2 wagons is optimal and is the ratio to maintain the maximum speed.

However, this information is more than 2 years old, and no longer accurate.

The current fuel table clearly shows that this is no longer the case, and a newer source for the accurate information is also given in the same section.

The 1:2 statement and the accompanying link to reddit should be removed.

The productivity module payoff will probably change with:

• The change of some science pack recipes both in number of packs per craft and crafting time.
• The Low density structure recipe change.

I'm assuming that the grand picture probably won't shift drastically in that the rocket, labs and yellow and purple packs will stay good picks for first production modules. But the list will need updating to be more accurate.

Source: https://www.factorio.com/blog/post/fff-275

https://github.com/DDDGamer/factorio-cheat-sheet/blob/c78f3d2acccdf336f57912dbeb204974e69d3880/src/app/views/cheat-sheets/material-processing/material-processing.component.html#L51

I think the header should say Output.

Check overall mining section, esp "Miners needed to fill a belt" table

Ref: https://www.factorio.com/blog/post/fff-266

Example image (the finished product would have a proper symbol with properly sized and lined up text):

I can work on this issue, but would like to get it approved first.

Open webpage, CTRL + F and search for the text: percise
The right spelling should be precise.

So the corrected sentence would be: "Note: Pumps and Steam Turbines are rounded up for build ratios. See table for precise numbers."

• Scale any images as needed
• Compress images .. or/and
• Convert all images into .webp (https://caniuse.com/#feat=webp)?
• Convert gif to .webm (https://caniuse.com/#feat=webm)?

Note: probably should wait until 0.17 changes are in place and gather new HD game screenshots with the new UI and graphics updates.

I recommend putting a link to the highly regarded train automation tutorial somewhere in the links section. Since trains are still one of the things many players struggle with

https://www.reddit.com/r/factorio/comments/4f38sk/factorio_train_automation_complete_parts_23_and/

Spellcheck: round 1

• Add manifest
• Add Service worker
• Generate icons https://app-manifest.firebaseapp.com/

The science pack names are used in the "hover-over" text for the icons for the flasks/packs. There might be other instances where the names are used too.

Red: Automation science pack.
Green: Logistic science pack.
Grey: Military science pack.
Blue: Chemical science pack.
Purple: Production science pack.
Yellow: Utility science pack.
White: Space science pack.

Source: https://www.factorio.com/blog/post/fff-275

For reference, straight from FFF#275:

The title.

The image icons switch around, get duplicated, and shear oddly when viewing with either Safari or Chrome on iOS. Pinch to zoom or unzoom also make the icons change.

Example image (data values are made up):

The example only shows laser turrets because it would be simpler to calculate - only have to take into account rate of fire research and damage research. Gun turrets have rate of fire, gun turret damage, bullet damage, and ammo used, which would probably involve a drop down menu to select at least 2 of those variables to set.

The numbers for u235/u238 to fill yellow/red/blue belts are off.

They should be yellow: 178, Red: 356, Blue: 534

Buildings = Belt throughput / ( crafting speed * (items produced/crafting time) )
Blue = 40 / (0.75 * (1/10))
Red = 40 (2/3) / (0.75 * (1/10))
Yellow = (40/3) / (0.75 * (1/10))

Relevant quote from Friday Facts #276:

The change overall gives a 12.5% buff to belts, provides nice round integers for calculating factory requirements, and removes a few oddities.

Yellow Belt will be 15 i/s for both sides.
Red Belt will be 30 i/s for both sides.
Blue Belt will be 45 i/s for both sides.

Source: https://factorio.com/blog/post/fff-276

The app behind this link stopped working http://deniszholob.com/factorio/blueprints/#bpbScience

Is it possible to provide an alternative?

Red (Automation science pack) will stay the same.

Green (Logistic science pack) might get a 1x pipe added to it, but this is not yet confirmed in FFF#275

2x Grey (Military science pack) will be 1x Piercing rounds magazine, 1x Grenade, 2x Wall.

2x Blue (Chemical science pack) will be 1x Solid fuel, 3x Advanced circuit and 2x Engine unit. "Now a single craft of Science pack 3 returns 2x as well. The ingredient count and crafting time has been increased to compensate."

3x Purple (Production science pack) will be 30x Rail, 1x Electric furnace, 1x Productivity module. "Production science pack now returns 3x packs in a single craft."

3x Yellow (Utility science pack): 2x Processing unit, 1x Flying robot frame, 3x Low density structure. "Utility science pack now returns 3x packs per craft, making it clear that it is the same tier as Production science pack. Processing units stay, but their number is reduced from 3 to 2, it was just too many."

1000x White (Space science pack), cost to launch one rocket: 1x Satellite, 1000x Rocket control unit, 1000x Low density structure, 1000x Rocket fuel.

Source: https://www.factorio.com/blog/post/fff-275

Pictures from FFF#275:

The site is currently resulting in a 404 error

Most science packs get a different recipe and/or different ratio.

Source: https://www.factorio.com/blog/post/fff-275

Add another cheat sheet with stack related things

• Stack table for all items: https://wiki.factorio.com/Stack
• Train cargo wagon stacks: 4 rows of 10 = 40
• Steel, iron wood chests
• Stacks per chest for cargo wagon

Submitted by Killcreek2

In the section for rocket production, it shows 22 LDS, 21 RCU, 20 RF for the totals required.
However, that is incorrect ratio as the satellite uses 100 LDS plus 50 RF not 50 RCU.
Should be 22 LDS, 20 RCU, 21 RF.
(I'm assuming it was simply a typo / swapped icon while copying to the cheatsheet.)
Did find a spelling error too, in the "inserter capacity bonus" section: "but instantely grab a stack from containers" should be "instantly".

1. There's a graphic with the "Number of assemblers needed to produce science equally". This graphic will be out of date when 0.17 hits.
2. Also Science Research Unlocks will probably be different when 0.17 hits.

Source: https://www.factorio.com/blog/post/fff-275
Look at section: "Step 3: Technologies and science unlocks" in the blog post, for a detailed breakdown of what each pack will unlock.

Update fuel values (looks like they will be halved)
Double check any fuel related calculations like
* "Furnaces supplied by coal belt" table
* "Boilers supported by belt of fuel" table
* Check "Smelting Facts" (Stone and Steel Furnaces consume ??? coal/second.)
Ref: https://www.factorio.com/blog/post/fff-266

This is already addressed the nuke section, but not very clearly. I recommend adopting the Single Reactor Equivalent (SRE) unit to describe potential power generation in reactor setups (Where a single reactor produces one SRE worth of power and three reactors in a line produce 2 + 3 + 2 = 7 SRE worth of power.)

Spending a paragraph describing the unit and the adjacency bonus would allow the remainder of the documentation to be simplified and abridged by making everything based on the now-understood SRE unit.

From FFF275:

The Space science pack is only influenced by Low density structures having a slightly different recipe (20x copper plate, 2x steel plate, 5x plastic bar), but other than that it is the same.

Source: https://www.factorio.com/blog/post/fff-275

This recipe change will probably also affect the Productivity module payoff for the low density structure.

https://davemcw.com/factorio/tech-tree/

• Add link to known issues that directs here
• Note to check with the wiki first for any information that seems outdated
• Add "thank you to the community who made previous cheatsheets and other resources such as the Wiki, and Reddit threads which this is based on"

I didn't make up more than half of those colors. In fact, I am using different ones. Please don't associate the train colors with my name. Thank you.

The fluidwagon has changed starting from Factorio version 0.16.7, the fluidwagon is now 1 tank, instead of 3 smaller tanks. So the picture and the text relating to the "Separated Wagon Tanks" can be removed, because this functionality is not in the base game anymore.

Link for the changelog for version 0.16.7:
https://www.reddit.com/r/factorio/comments/7lbkiz/version_0167/

See the Factorio Friday for the developers thinking on this:
https://www.factorio.com/blog/post/fff-222

https://www.reddit.com/r/factorio/comments/5e3uuf/what_is_your_color_scheme_for_trains/

The numbers for inserter throughput are from 0.15 and some of them have changed with the belt updates in 0.16

The accurate numbers are on the wiki: https://wiki.factorio.com/Inserters#Chest_to_belt

There's a note with a link to a video by xterminator in the part about prod modules in labs.

This information is actually wrong. Yes, the bars reset when you switch research, but you don't actually lose any progress, since the progress from both the regular and the productivity bar are continiously added to the total when doing research.

For example:

• Build 10 labs.
• Give each lab 1 red pack
• Research automation.

The packs will all be exactly gone when research completes.

Now do the same, but with prod modules and you'll see that all labs will have an equal amount of packs left after finishing the research, and none of the labs will have actually finished a full cycle.

• Change Table title to "Sample Balancer Blueprints"
• Make this a list:
  • Balancers that are input balanced take evenly from input belts.
  • Balancers that are output balanced distribute evenly to output belts.
  • Balancers that are throughput limited may not be able to provide maximum output if one or more outputs are blocked.

Other Thoughts...

• There is a new Balancer Guide made maybe link to that? https://www.reddit.com/r/factorio/comments/9x3m14/i_couldnt_find_a_general_guide_to_balancers_so_i/
• Another List maybe worth looking at: https://www.reddit.com/r/factorio/comments/9y4zjl/standard_56_67_and_78_balancers_dont_quite/
• Also found a link to a screenshot of the now old wiki balancers page
  https://imgur.com/gallery/Qtv6xHD

Should Be
For Lazy Bastard Achievement Open Console, type /permissions, Disable Craft

It would be nice to have a way to adjust the numbers of miners required to fill a belt based on that bonus. From just the green science phase, the game gives access to productivity bonuses on miners, and from then on, the numbers aren't accurate, so it's no longer useful as a quick reference.

Thanks again!

• Need to update all the screenshots with the new High res/redone graphics.
• Run through https://tinyjpg.com/ to optimize
• Add Belt weaving screenshot to tips

Add Nuclear Fuel entry in the Train Speed table
https://wiki.factorio.com/Nuclear_fuel
acceleration bonus of 250% (+150%)

https://wiki.factorio.com/Fuel