ddd-crew / context-mapping Goto Github PK

I believe something might be wrong with the "Remote Context Mapping Starter Kit" file. I've tried uploading it to Miro a few times but each time I try I get an error message:

"Sorry, something went wrong"

Great work!
Just a micro remark: Wouldn't it be better to remove the arrow in the Customer-Supplier picture or turn it around?!
I mean the "Customer gets" something which the "Supplier provides". Or did I miss something?
Best greetings
Stefan

First thanks for your work.
Do you think the interchange context pattern as described by Eric Evans here could be a candidate ?

Hello @mploed

I was wondering if you had already seen or done such a thing: having a 2 levels context maps where 1st level would focus only on team relationships and 2nd level, only on context map patterns.

Here's an example:
(and yes, obviously the Cus-->Sup relationship should be the other way round ;) )

Team relationships

Context map patterns

Both

What do you think? Does it make sense or useful to separate both perspective?

Thanks!

Maxime

Hello,

In the second example, the text is "C and D are mutually dependent" while it's C and B.

HTH.

Loved the repository!

Just a small fix, I think there is a problem with the following example:

From what I understand from the diagram, the first item should say that C and B are mutually dependent instead of C and D are mutually dependent

Could someone please explain better why the "Partnership" and "Customer-Supplier" are patterns and not team relationships? It seems like a mistake of categorization.
Even the explanation of these "patterns" begin with teams relationships.
If the aim of the repo is to simplify the understanding, I think it would be greate to either fix the categorization issue or explain why it was made this way.
I think Evanse's book is not a Bible and could tolerate new interpretations, doesn't it?

The page:

https://virtualddd.com/learning-ddd/ddd-crew-context-mapping#contributions-and-feedback

has a broken link to:

https://virtualddd.com/learning-ddd/ddd-crew-context-mapping//7a1da02b8994e78f3381e9c3b091ae47/Remote-Context-Mapping-Starter-Kit.rtb

That should probably be:

https://github.com/ddd-crew/context-mapping/blob/master/resources/Remote-Context-Mapping-Starter-Kit.rtb

How big is a domain? How big is a bounded-context?

Does a bounded-context belong to a (only one) team (squad in Spotify Model)? Can a domain small-sized to belong to a team? Or does it always represent a bigger thing (like an entire company and its business units* - or each business unit is a domain...)?

I am deep-diving in the DDD's world and I would like to hear some opinions about hierarchies (agg root, bounded context, domain, [after domain?]) and the right size (if that is possible).

*business unit in this context is a line of bussines attended by the company. Example: a bank (company) can offer stock services, core banking services or loans - each as a independent line of business.

Thanks

Hello, can I have access to post a PR, on this repo?