Can an extra interface representing the abstract for all MemoryPackable types be added ? about memorypack HOT 7 CLOSED

I have tested Solution 2 by reference MemoryPack source project in mine, after adding an extra interface, just to find i still need all extra formatters for all types. for interfaces defined in MemoryPack r not MemoryPackables themselves, lol
So i take Solution 1.

from memorypack.

I don't understand what you say...
Before making suggestions, please give specific code for the problem.

from memorypack.

it's not easy to express with codes, i'll try below:

my old code:

public class MyClass
{
object[] items;
}

I want to make it MemoryPackable, so i refactor it to:

[MemoryPackable]
public partial class MyClass
{
object[] items;                               <- i expect IMemoryPackableObject[] Items here, for object array seems can not be serialized 
                                                          by MemoryPack.
}

from memorypack.

To begin with, objects cannot be serialized.
This is because the type is not known at deserialization time.

from memorypack.

so i need a common type/interface for all MemoryPackable types, such as IMemoryPackableObject

from memorypack.

I don't know what the solution to that is.
If you want object's Formatter, you can define it?

from memorypack.

Solution1: myself, to define a root level interface for all my types which is marked with [MemoryPackable] to inherit from, and use a formatter to reigster all these inheriting types under that interface.

Solution2: MemoryPack adds a rootlevel interface inherited by the existing IMemoryPackFormatterRegister, as i've suggested. Then i can serve that Interface directly as the type parameter as in List, Dictionary<T1,T2> ... to allow the List or Dictionary accomodating elements of any MemoryPackable types.

from memorypack.