Remove transparency of unprepared spells about dungeon-sheets HOT 3 CLOSED

Well it would be --unprepared-spell-color=grey with a short -u option as well.

Maybe it's better to just make them all the same color for now, and then find a way to indicate which, if any, are prepared, with an asterisk or something. That way, the use of prepared spells is optional.

I'm still working on this open PR (#18) to use a D&D themed LaTeX template for spell lists, so there might be a more obvious way to indicate which spells are prepared. I've accepted the PR for this change and we can think about the way to bring prepared_spells back in later.

from dungeon-sheets.

My 2 cents:

I agree that having spells greyed out makes them unreadable sometimes. I personally would prefer to have all spells in black and track those that are prepared separately (e.g. marking them myself with a pencil). Having unprepared spells readable is also useful for deciding which spells I want to prepare.

An option would be ok, although I'd probably not go for -u since that is too unclear what u means but maybe that's just me. A configuration file might be nice, especially if there is more choices like that in the future. And I definitely agree that it's better to keep things like this somewhere else than in the character definition file.

from dungeon-sheets.

Yeah I can see that being annoying.

I'd prefer something like your second idea of having it be an option in the character python file, though I'd also rather limit the .py files to descriptions of the character itself, not preferences for how the sheets are rendered.

How about adding a command line option to make_sheets.py that changes the color. Maybe --unprepared-spell-color=grey and -u grey? That way people can change the color to suite their preference. The downside here is that you have to remember to add that flag every time you run makesheets, which then creates a need for a dunegonsheets.rc file or something like that.

Would that work for your use case?

from dungeon-sheets.