Add inherent DI support about avalonia HOT 4 CLOSED

Hi Glenn,

I would be interested to hear your thoughts on this. I agree that it's best to do try to get this right now while things are still fresh.

Could you give examples of some use-cases you have in mind?

from avalonia.

These are just a few really general examples, but making Perspex DI-friendly would make it really easy to build composable application shells, such as:

• Gemini
• Wide
• Orchestra

Not only would having DI support baked in (whether through a specific framework, or via an interface implemented by the user) make it easier to build composable applications, it would make it easier to build applications that gain reliability by isolating parts of the application in their own process, like Chrome (and, soon, Firefox) do. Baktun Shell is an example of this in .NET.

from avalonia.

Thanks for your input @nerdshark. Is there anything in particular that you think is missing today, or could be implemented today? I'd like to hear some more concrete proposals surrounding this.

from avalonia.

I will try to find some cycles to give you an illustration of what I mean.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 5:20 PM Steven Kirk [email protected] wrote:

Closed #17 #17.

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#17 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAInRLJFvafc5_2aIb24kIFgfEdGb3nwks5qb97qgaJpZM4DNT5Y
.

from avalonia.