Code Monkey home page Code Monkey logo

uat's Introduction

IMPORTANT NOTE:

Feedback on the UAT should be submitted via the options listed in CONTRIBUTING.md.

Please note that this project is released with a Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct. By participating in this project you agree to abide by its terms.

ABOUT THE UAT:

This Unified Astronomy Thesaurus (UAT) is an open, interoperable and community-supported thesaurus which unifies the existing divergent and isolated Astronomy & Astrophysics thesauri into a single high-quality, freely-available open thesaurus formalizing astronomical concepts and their inter-relationships.

The UAT builds upon the existing IAU Thesaurus with major contributions from the Astronomy portions of the thesauri developed by the Institute of Physics Publishing and the American Institute of Physics. We expect that the Unified Astronomy Thesaurus will be further enhanced and updated through a collaborative effort involving broad community participation.

While the AAS has assumed formal ownership of the UAT, the work will be available under a Creative Commons License, ensuring its widest use while protecting the intellectual property of the contributors. We envision that development and maintenance will be stewarded by a broad group of parties having a direct stake in it. This includes professional associations (IVOA, IAU), learned societies (AAS, RAS), publishers (IOP, AIP), librarians and other curators working for major astronomy institutes and data archives.

More information and updates are available from http://astrothesaurus.org

LICENSE:

The Unified Astronomy Thesaurus is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. See LICENSE.md for details.

uat's People

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

uat's Issues

Consider adding concepts for "possible" designations, submitted by CDS 1/5/2017

See CDS Object Type list. http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-display?data=otypes

  ·  ·  Candidate_S*     	S*?     	Possible S Star    
  ·  ·  Candidate_OH     	OH?     	Possible Star with envelope of OH/IR type    
  ·  ·  Candidate_CH     	CH?     	Possible Star with envelope of CH type    
  ·  ·  Candidate_WR*     	WR?     	Possible Wolf-Rayet Star    
  ·  ·  Candidate_Be*     	Be?     	Possible Be Star   

For example, CDS classifiers find it useful to be able to classify an object as "Possible S Star" when the referenced authors believe the object might be an S Star but aren't certain.

Is there a way to add "Possible" as a modifier instead of adding a large set of concepts?

Add concept: Subdwarfs, submitted by Sarah Weissman (STScI) 8/8/2016

Added a category for subdwarfs. Many people study them as a group.

Stellar types-->Subdwarfs-->A subdwarfs
Stellar types-->Subdwarfs-->B subdwarfs
Stellar types-->Subdwarfs-->O subdwarfs
Stellar types-->Subdwarfs-->F subdwarfs
Stellar types-->Subdwarfs-->K subdwarfs
Stellar types-->Subdwarfs-->M subdwarfs
Stellar types-->Subdwarfs

Term revision - Mercury

I suggest relabelling 'Mercury' as 'Mercury (planet)', as with 'Earth (planet)'. This will help disambiguate usage for the chemical element.

Add Concept: Shell stars, submitted by Sarah Weissman (STScI) 8/8/2016

Added "Shell star" category. In the APT vocab. Defined here as "A hot main-sequence star, usually of spectral class B, A, or F, whose spectrum shows bright emission lines presumed to be due to a gaseous ring or shell surrounding the star."

Stellar astronomy-->Stellar types-->Chemically peculiar stars-->Shell stars

Standardize usage of plural nouns

Best practices in controlled vocabularies for plural vs. singular nouns (section 6.5 of Z39.19 http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/12591/z39-19-2005r2010.pdf):

Count Nouns are subject to the question "How many?" i.e. "How many books?" "How many galaxies?"
Mass Nouns are subject to the question "How much?" i.e. "How much copper paint?" "How much interstellar dust?"

Exceptions:
Noun as a class with more than one member, i.e. "paints" to describe many different types of paint.
Domain use, i.e. "ear" in a medical vocabulary, since they are generally considered as singular in the domain.
Abstract concepts, such as activities, emotions, properties, should be expressed as singular.
Proper names should be singular, such as "Milky Way Galaxy" or "Solar System."

Make Plural:
Dust shell
Rotating shell
Convective zone
Convective envelope
Stellar interior
Stellar structure
Carbon flash
Circumstellar envelope
Stellar inner core

Make Singular?
Stellar masses (falls under the exception of "properties"?)
Stellar mass functions (check other functions)
(consider all concepts under "Stellar properties")

Add concept/section: Morgan-Keenan spectral types, submitted by Sarah Weissman (STScI) 8/8/2016

Added a second category for Morgan-Keenan spectral types so that we can have umbrella categories for A stars, B stars, etc

Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->A stars-->A dwarfs
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->A stars-->A giants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->A stars-->A subdwarfs
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->A stars-->A subgiants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->A stars-->A supergiants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->A stars-->Ae stars-->Herbig Ae/Be stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->A stars-->Ae stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->A stars-->Am stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->A stars-->Ap stars-->Holmium stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->A stars-->Ap stars-->Manganese stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->A stars-->Ap stars-->Silicon stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->A stars-->Ap stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->A stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->B stars-->53 Persei stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->B stars-->B dwarfs
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->B stars-->B giants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->B stars-->B subdwarfs
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->B stars-->B subgiants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->B stars-->B supergiants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->B stars-->BW stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->B stars-->Be stars-->Herbig Ae/Be stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->B stars-->Be stars-->Lambda Eridani stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->B stars-->Be stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->B stars-->Bp stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->B stars-->Mercury-manganese stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->B stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->O stars-->O dwarfs
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->O stars-->O giant stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->O stars-->O subdwarfs
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->O stars-->O subgiants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->O stars-->O supergiants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->O stars-->Oe stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->O stars-->Oef stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->O stars-->Of stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->O stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->OB stars-->OB supergiants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->OB stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->F stars-->F dwarfs-->Fp stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->F stars-->F dwarfs
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->F stars-->F giants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->F stars-->F subdwarfs
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->F stars-->F subgiants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->F stars-->F supergiants-->UU Herculis stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->F stars-->F supergiants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->F stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->G stars-->G dwarfs
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->G stars-->G giants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->G stars-->G subdwarfs
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->G stars-->G subgiants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->G stars-->G supergiants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->G stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->K stars-->K dwarfs
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->K stars-->K giants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->K stars-->K subdwarfs
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->K stars-->K subgiants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->K stars-->K supergiants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->K stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->M stars-->M dwarfs
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->M stars-->M giants-->Me variable stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->M stars-->M giants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->M stars-->M subdwarfs
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->M stars-->M subgiants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->M stars-->M supergiants
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->M stars-->Me stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types-->M stars
Stellar types-->Morgan-Keenan spectral types

Clean up of sibling/ancestor pairs, submitted by Sarah Weissman (STScI) 8/11/2016

I also have a large-ish list of pairs of concepts that are both siblings and ancestors, e.g.:
Galactic and extragalactic astronomy,Galaxy physics,Galaxy dynamics,,,,,,,
Galactic and extragalactic astronomy,Galaxy physics,Galaxy processes,Galaxy dynamics,,,,,,
I will attach the list but maybe we should start a Google doc somewhere and we can make it a group effort to fix these as we have time? Some of them are obvious how to fix, but not all. Just a thought. I'll let you decide!

See attached
sibling-ancestor-pairs.txt

Add concept: Magnetospheric radio emissions, submitted by Baptiste Cecconi (IVOA Semantics Group) 7/22/2016

First I would set "Planetary Atmosphere" and "Planetary Magnetosphere", as two different terms next to the other. I'm sure I've ever seen the magnetosphere defined as a layer of the atmosphere of a planet. Furthermore, all planetary body hosting a magnetic field has a magnetosphere, not only Earth. At the moment, in the UAT, only "Earth Atmosphere" has a "magnetosphere" child concept.

I would see something like this:
Solar System Astronomy : Planetary science : Planetary Magnetosphere : Magnetospheric radio emissions
Solar System Astronomy : Planetary science : Planetary Magnetosphere : Earth Magnetosphere : Magnetospheric radio emission

If you want to see at "working case", used for data description, have a look to the SPASE Region concept:
http://spase-group.org/data/reference/spase-2_2_6/spase-2_2_6_xsd.htm#Region

Add Concept: Transients, submitted by Sarah Weissman (STScI) 8/8/2016

Added category for transients - X-ray source means something that is always there. A transient wouldn't be seen except for a brief period of time where it goes off and then you don't see it anymore. These were in APT but not in UAT.

High energy astrophysics -->Transients -->Gamma Ray bursters
High energy astrophysics -->Transients -->Gamma Ray transients
High energy astrophysics -->Transients -->UV transients
High energy astrophysics -->Transients -->X-ray transients
High energy astrophysics -->Transients

Clean up section: Binary stars, submitted by Sarah Weissman (STScI) 8/8/2016

Cleaned up binary star sections. There were some things that weren't under the Interacting binaries section that should be. Eruptive binaries is an uncommon term, so removed it. "Close binaries" and "Interacting binaries" are almost the same thing, but technically not. I was tempted to merge these into one category, but was advised to keep them separate by our scientists.

See attached for more detail.
binarstarcleanup.xlsx

Reorganize section: Main sequence, submitted by Sarah Weissman (STScI) 8/8/2016

Reorganized Main sequence category - Main sequence stars are synonymous with dwarf stars, so anything that's not a dwarf should (not?) be in this category.

Main sequence stars-->Early-type main sequence stars-->A dwarfs
Main sequence stars-->Early-type main sequence stars-->B dwarfs
Main sequence stars-->Early-type main sequence stars-->O dwarfs
Main sequence stars-->Early-type main sequence stars
Main sequence stars-->Intermediate-type main sequence stars-->F dwarfs
Main sequence stars-->Intermediate-type main sequence stars-->F dwarfs-->Fp stars
Main sequence stars-->Intermediate-type main sequence stars-->G dwarfs
Main sequence stars-->Intermediate-type main sequence stars
Main sequence stars-->Late-type main sequence stars-->K dwarfs
Main sequence stars-->Late-type main sequence stars-->L dwarfs
Main sequence stars-->Late-type main sequence stars-->M dwarfs
Main sequence stars-->Late-type main sequence stars-->T dwarfs
Main sequence stars-->Late-type main sequence stars
Main sequence stars-->Yellow stragglers
Main sequence stars-->Zero-age main sequence stars
Main sequence stars

Clean up "Irregular galaxies," submitted by Sarah Weissman (STScI) 8/8/2016

Cleaned up the "Irregular galaxies" category. The morphological classification of irregular galaxies typically contains three types Type 1 / magellanic irregular, type 2 / amorphous irregular and Dwarf Irregular. "I galaxies" isn't meaningful according to our scientists. We could add "Irr I galaxies" as a synonym for magellanic irregular and "Irr II galaxies" as a syonym for amorphus. (It's possible that "I galaxies" was supposed to mean "Irr I galaxies" but it's not clear to me.)
See:
https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/CLASSIFICATION/miag.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregular_galaxy
Binney and Merrifield, Galactic Astronomy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_sequence

Irregular galaxies-->Magellanic irregular galaxies-->Magellanic Clouds-->Large Magellanic Cloud
Irregular galaxies-->Magellanic irregular galaxies-->Magellanic Clouds-->Magellanic Stream
Irregular galaxies-->Magellanic irregular galaxies-->Magellanic Clouds-->Small Magellanic Cloud
Irregular galaxies-->Magellanic irregular galaxies-->Magellanic Clouds
Irregular galaxies-->Magellanic irregular galaxies

Add Branch: Calibration, submitted by Sarah Weissman (STScI) 5/17/2016

I am still working with the developers of the Astronomer's Proposal Tool (APT) at STScI, who are planning on using the UAT to replace their existing target vocabulary. I am pretty sure that many of the terms they currently use for describing calibration "targets" are not in the thesaurus. I was thinking that they could go under

Observational Astronomy -> Techniques -> Calibration

Revise concepts under "Stellar abundances"

Suggest revising the terms under 'Stellar abundances'. At present, they are

  • Beryllium
  • Boron
  • Helium
  • Lithium

These are chemical elements, not types of abundance, and therefore don't meet any of the three BT/NT relationships:

  • All-and-some
  • Whole/part
  • Class/instance

I suggest revising the terms to:

  • Beryllium abundance
  • Boron abundance
  • Helium abundance
  • Lithium abundance
    i.e. making four new terms, with the relevant chemical elements linked as reltaed terms.

Reorganize concept: Magnetospheric radio emissions [Exoplanets], submitted by Baptiste Cecconi (IVOA Semantics Group) 7/17/2016

...the term "Magnetospheric radio emissions [Exoplanets]" [..] is presented as a narrower term than "Gravitational microlensing [Exoplanets]". I can't really understand on what ground that link was made. My suggestion would be that there is a "Magnetospheric radio emissions" (outside the exoplanet context), as those radio emissions are observed and studied since the 50's... while exoplanetary radio emissions have not been detected yet.

To me they [magnetospheric radio emissions and gravitational microlensing] are both possible detection methods for exoplanets, but there is no apparent hierarchical link between them.

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.