alanfranz / atom-text-editor-repository Goto Github PK

Thank for the repository work.

The current RPM package made available is a little bit outdated :

[[email protected]:~]$ rpm -q atom
atom-1.30.0-0.1.x86_64

Could you please sync the rpm version made available to the latest, like the deb one ?

Cheers.

It seems that debian repository is broken

The webupd8team by Alin Andrei and others also rolls Atom deb packages. Perhaps you guys can combine efforts in this. Making it less and better work for all. See also https://launchpad.net/~webupd8team/+archive/ubuntu/atom and https://launchpad.net/~webupd8team/+contactuser

This might also speed up the adoption of this package in the official repositories of Ubuntu and Debian.

Please, offer a Debian repository for testing such as

deb http://www.a9f.eu/apt/atom/debian testing main

Hey, would you be able to also provide wily support so that we could use the APT line:
deb http://www.a9f.eu/apt/atom/ubuntu wily main
?
thank you!

First, thanks for running this repository!

On Debian stretch (with multiarch enabled) since yesterday I get this error on apt update:

E: Failed to fetch https://dl.bintray.com/alanfranz/atom-apt/dists/stable/InRelease Unable to find expected entry 'main/binary-i386/Packages' in Release file (Wrong sources.list entry or malformed file)

But from atom_stable_retrieve.py I understand you only provide amd64 packages anyway? So I don't get why apt searches for an i386/Packages file. Changing the sources.list line from

deb https://dl.bintray.com/alanfranz/atom-apt stable main

to

deb [arch=amd64] https://dl.bintray.com/alanfranz/atom-apt stable main

fixes this. But this was not necessary before. Maybe there is some configuration on bintray to specify the architecture?

After every apt-get update, following warning:

W: gpgv:/var/lib/apt/lists/www.a9f.eu_apt_atom_debian_dists_jessie_InRelease: The repository is insufficiently signed by key A1D267C030C00DCB877900ED939C61C5D1270819 (weak digest)

Probably because you use SHA1 or weak digest algorithms.

Can you please enable Fedora 24?

I apologize in advance for being ignorant and/or lazy, but exactly what are the proper lines to add to /etc/apt/sources.list?

If this would be different for every release then you shouldn't take the trouble. But could you point to where to figure this out?

Hello, there. I am really interested on beta releases.
Is there any way I can help you?

I'm not hosting beta releases and I don't plan to, right now (open a ticket if you're really interested); I plan to host stable releases only.