ahmadnassri / benchmark-node-clone Goto Github PK

👋

I just found two new utilities xtend and deep-extend.

During some googling, I came across fast-clone, deep-clone, and fast-deepclone. That last one is written in C++ and sounds interesting. Wondering if it's any faster. Could you add it to the benchmark?

Version 2.1.4 of benchmark just got published.

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build failed.

As benchmark is “only” a devDependency of this project it might not break production or downstream projects, but “only” your build or test tools – preventing new deploys or publishes.

I recommend you give this issue a high priority. I’m sure you can resolve this 💪

Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

Version 2.1.3 of benchmark just got published.

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build failed.

As benchmark is “only” a devDependency of this project it might not break production or downstream projects, but “only” your build or test tools – preventing new deploys or publishes.

I recommend you give this issue a high priority. I’m sure you can resolve this 💪

Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

Version 8.6.0 of standard just got published.

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build failed.

As standard is “only” a devDependency of this project it might not break production or downstream projects, but “only” your build or test tools – preventing new deploys or publishes.

I recommend you give this issue a high priority. I’m sure you can resolve this 💪

Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

Repos:

• https://github.com/engineforce/ImmutableAssign
• https://github.com/schnittstabil/merge-options

package.json:

// ...
"immutable-assign": "^2.0.6",
"merge-options": "^1.0.1"
// ...

Run npm install and continue:
index.js:

// ...
const iassign = require('immutable-assign')
const mergeOptions = require('merge-options')
// ...
'immutable-assign': data => iassign({}, ()=>data), // is that correct?
'merge-options': mergeOptions // is that correct?
// ...

Results:

Please confirm that

Version 9.0.2 of standard just got published.

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build failed.

As standard is “only” a devDependency of this project it might not break production or downstream projects, but “only” your build or test tools – preventing new deploys or publishes.

I recommend you give this issue a high priority. I’m sure you can resolve this 💪

Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

Version 2.1.1 of echint just got published.

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build failed.

As echint is “only” a devDependency of this project it might not break production or downstream projects, but “only” your build or test tools – preventing new deploys or publishes.

I recommend you give this issue a high priority. I’m sure you can resolve this 💪

Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

Version 2.1.0 of echint just got published.

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build failed.

As echint is “only” a devDependency of this project it might not break production or downstream projects, but “only” your build or test tools – preventing new deploys or publishes.

I recommend you give this issue a high priority. I’m sure you can resolve this 💪

Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

I'd say the result lists become easier to read when they are sorted by operations per second, rather than alphabetically. Makes it easy to glance at the 'winners' and 'losers'.

Good idea?

Hi, and thx for this very useful project !

I was wondering : searching for the fastest clone method, I found out fast-clone wich claims to be 2x~3x faster than lodash.cloneDeep.
So would it be possible to add it to the benchmark ?

Thx in advance.