Waypoint routes about atc HOT 3 CLOSED

How would you feel about a complete revamp of navigation requests? I have the following semantics in mind:

• plane f abofa a 2 f kaito s 100 f goody l 36r would mean: fly to abofa, uppon arrival at abofa change altitude to 2000ft and fix kaito. Uppon arrival at kaito decelerate to 100 and fix goody. Uppon arrival at goody initiate landing on runway 36R.
• plane a 8 fix divec h 0 a 4 would mean: immediately change altitude to 8000ft and fix divec. Uppon arrival at divec change heading to 0 bearing and change altitude to 4000ft.

As you can see, the fix command creates a barrier in the queue. Commands following the fix command are executed uppon arrival at the fix.

I realise this would take a major rewrite of the navigation system. This is why I would like to know wether you are interested in a patch, that implements the described behaviour.

from atc.

Is that syntax used in real life? If it is, I'd gladly accept a patch.

from atc.

I can't really comment on that since I have never sat in front of an atc terminal but I feel this user interface is most intuitive.

Will get to work later today.

from atc.