Number of training which the result is averaged over about sted-gaze HOT 3 CLOSED

Hi San,

By variation of results, do you mean the variation of evaluation metrics? If so, how big is the variation? Also, which table are you trying to reproduce?

Cheers,
Yufeng

from sted-gaze.

Hi, Thank you for your quick response.

I was about to reproduce Table 2. For example, in the case of gaze redirection, the difference between the first and second trials is about 0.6. Is the results are reasonable?

Thank you

from sted-gaze.

Hi,

Table 2 in the main paper is only based on 1 training trial.
But if you go to table 1 in the supplementary material, you can see that the gaze redirection error is below 2.4 even when the loss weights are not optimal, and we didn't cherry-pick experiment trials. So I think a difference of 0.6 is a bit big (I assume that you are talking about our final method, not the ablation ones in the first three rows of table 2, main paper.)

Cheers,
Yufeng

from sted-gaze.