About pedestrian '0_5_12b' about jaad HOT 5 CLOSED

Pedestrian 0_5_12b is a man with a small girl in a pink coat. There was a mistake in the attributes which is now corrected. This should resolve your questions regarding the frame range for the pedestrian.

In case there are other errors in the attributes, I suggest visualizing the data to establish the correspondences between the pedestrians and their labels. All annotations and videos can be viewed using CVAT. Version 0.3.0 is the one we used for the original annotations, I am not sure the XML files will work with the latest CVAT.

Poses were computed for all bounding boxes, even partially or fully occluded. Poses are likely not very good for those. In the benchmark occlusion was only present for a small percentage of the data since we only took the observation part, therefore we used it as is. You may want to experiment with filtering pose information by occlusion tag.

from jaad.

Hi Iuliia,

Many thanks for your reply and for correcting the attributes! That's very kind of you!

Also thanks a lot for your comments on the pose data in the benchmark since we are particularly interested in this.

By the way, can I ask have you performed normalization for the pose data? I have observed some pose data and found the range is between 0 and 1. So I am wondering this.

Thanks a lot again!

Bests,
Xingchen

from jaad.

Hi,

I have tried to use CVAT to visualise your annotations. The version I am using is the latest one I think (link is here https://cvat.org/tasks). However, the visualisation results and the annotation XML file do not match (not sure if this is related to the version of CVAT. I haven't successfully installed CVAT 0.3.0 yet).

The first problem is 'old_id' in the XML file is displayed instead of 'id'. For example, 'pedestrian' is displayed rather than '0_5_13b'.

The second problem is that, the displayed 'old_id' is not the same as that in the XML file. For example, the pedestrian '0_5_12b', its 'old_id' is pedestrian5, but in CVAT, 'PEDESTRIAN 7 (MANUAL)' is displayed.

This inconsistency exists for many other pedestrians...I am not sure if this is related to the version of CVAT, and don't know if you have encountered similar issues previously.

Bests,
Xingchen

from jaad.

I don’t recall having the issues you described with the latest cvat. Still, I do recommend using the older version in which the annotations were created.

from jaad.

OK, thank you very much for your quick reply!

I will try to install the older version again to see if that works.

Thanks!
Xingchen

from jaad.