Why excluding requirejs about bower-requirejs HOT 6 CLOSED

I couldn't think of a reason it would make sense to include RequireJS in your RequireJS config at that time yeoman/grunt-bower-requirejs#9

@robdodson is this common?

from bower-requirejs.

@sergeylukin are you using r.js to compile everything into one file? if so can you post your r.js config.

from bower-requirejs.

Yes, you can find it in https://github.com/sergeylukin/emmet.docpad
I'm currently including almond instead, but requirejs may be required in some cases

Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone from orange

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Dodson [email protected]
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 07:20:03
To: yeoman/[email protected]
Reply-To: yeoman/grunt-bower-requirejs [email protected]
Cc: Sergey [email protected]
Subject: Re: [grunt-bower-requirejs] Why excluding requirejs (#34)

@sergeylukin are you using r.js to compile everything into one file? if so can you post your r.js config.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
yeoman/grunt-bower-requirejs#34 (comment)

from bower-requirejs.

ah ok I see. I've always used the combined require-jquery and included that in my builds. I thought r.js included requirejs for you but looks like it doesn't.

@sindresorhus here's an example showing how you can create a path called requireLib and set it to require.js. It's also discussed in the r.js docs here.. If you don't do that then requirejs won't end up in your built distribution.

I think if/when we see key === 'requirejs' we should create a path called requireLib. I don't think we want to create a path called requirejs or require because those are typically reserved. Sound ok @sergeylukin?

from bower-requirejs.

@robdodson thanks for notes. I think requireLib should do the trick as well but why would requirejs path be reserved? I mean even if it's already set and requirejs is installed via bower and grunt-bower-requirejs is used on purpose (which already suggests not setting any path that should refer to bower component instead..), it most likely refers to RequireJS library anyways, so no damage afaics, or am I missing something?

from bower-requirejs.

Not sure to be honest. I asked @jrburke over here: requirejs/requirejs#801. We'll see what he says.

from bower-requirejs.