[📖 Docs]: Mocha third party UIs about webdriverio HOT 6 OPEN

Actually with qunit you can run tests like this but it seems that reporters don't pick up the right test data for the reporting. Any contributions to improve this behavior would be appreciated.

from webdriverio.

@ethanyou725 can you elaborate on why you are interested to use a 3rd party UI for Mocha?

from webdriverio.

@ethanyou725 can you elaborate on why you are interested to use a 3rd party UI for Mocha?

Thanks for your kindly reply. Because we are migrating some exist test cases (*.spec.ts) to webdriverio.

e.g.
old case:

test('test case', async () => { 
    await step('1=1', async () => {
        await expect(1).toBe(1)
    })
})

in mocha without custom ui, bdd style it must use describe and it,
and with custom ui interface, we could have the ability not change the spec file.

from webdriverio.

Have you tried to set mochaOpts.ui to tdd?

from webdriverio.

Have you tried to set mochaOpts.ui to tdd?

yes, tdd provides different function suit, it could be more convenient if support custom ui.

from webdriverio.

Thanks for reporting!

We greatly appreciate any contributions that help resolve the bug. While we understand that active contributors have their own priorities, we kindly request your assistance if you rely on this bug being fixed. We encourage you to take a look at our contribution guidelines or join our friendly Discord development server, where you can ask any questions you may have. Thank you for your support, and cheers!

from webdriverio.