Awesome work! Would you mind benching against my library? <p dir

<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/us

Benchmark against Graphmath about matrex HOT 3 CLOSED

versilov commented on May 12, 2024

Benchmark against Graphmath

from matrex.

Comments (3)

versilov commented on May 12, 2024 2

@crertel , here is the bench for matrix multiplication.
GraphMath goes second to Matrex, but deviation from the average is huge.

Surely, if you use dedicated SIMD operations for 3 & 4 element vectors you can beat up everyone!

##### With input 3x3 #####
Name                ips        average  deviation         median         99th %
Matrex        3624.36 K        0.28 μs    ±35.11%        0.26 μs        0.51 μs
GraphMath     1310.16 K        0.76 μs   ±247.15%        0.70 μs        1.70 μs
Matrix         372.58 K        2.68 μs    ±47.31%        2.40 μs        6.20 μs
Numexy          89.72 K       11.15 μs   ±128.04%           9 μs          30 μs
ExMatrix        35.76 K       27.96 μs    ±47.28%          24 μs          67 μs

Comparison:
Matrex        3624.36 K
GraphMath     1310.16 K - 2.77x slower
Matrix         372.58 K - 9.73x slower
Numexy          89.72 K - 40.40x slower
ExMatrix        35.76 K - 101.35x slower

from matrex.

versilov commented on May 12, 2024

Hi!
Thank you.

Surely will do, I am curious also.

from matrex.