`yield.pred.sq` row missing from Tukey test? about agroft HOT 8 CLOSED

The row should be there if it runs the Tukey test. It is an error if not.

from agroft.

I deleted the Tukey 1df Test for the split-plot RCBD example (see pull request), as I think we should only use it for the basic RCBD with a single treatment rep per block.

from agroft.

In the ANOVA table output, we also get the error

Error in MEEM(object, conLin, control$niterEM) : 
Singularity in backsolve at level 0, block 1

I'm pretty sure this has to do with the data not being nested but the model is trying to analyze it as if the data are nested. I'll need to implement an error handler that is more informative for this issue.

from agroft.

@msimmond I just want to confirm that we don't want to run the tukey test for split plot designs?

from agroft.

That's correct.

from agroft.

@msimmond Tukey 1-df test is for 2-way ANOVA only, correct? So should we only be doing this for RCBD2 and CRD2?

from agroft.

Tukey 1-df test is for the RCBD tests only (i.e. RCBD1 and RCBD2). Not for
any CRD or split-plot.

Maegen Simmonds
Postdoctoral Scholar
Earth Systems Science
Stanford University
Green Blg, Rm 321
Stanford, CA 94305
Phone: (707) 694-6079
[email protected]

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Ian K. Kyle [email protected]
wrote:

@msimmond https://github.com/msimmond Tukey 1-df test is for 2-way
ANOVA only, correct? So should we only be doing this for RCBD2 and CRD2?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#90 (comment)

from agroft.

fixed

from agroft.