Inconsistent TonAPI data about tonapi HOT 5 CLOSED

TON has unlimited emission. so every block system produces few TONs - https://tonviewer.com/transaction/e94c68efe95c00ffd04e3db3617de67650604e845ef416314663717a017d5e69
Different resources uses different snapshots and probaly skips some accounts by different reasons.
5,089,309,338.398196663 - for example this sum of all acounts balances at this moment. but it grew up while i have been written this message.

from tonapi.

Thank you for your reply. However, this is the first time I have seen a blockchain project where the various explorer/statistics websites have such different and inconsistent values. This contradicts the transparency principle of the blockchain.
Furthermore, TON has an inflation of 0.6%, but thanks to the 50% burning of transaction fees, there is a breakeven point between creation due to inflation and destruction due to burning. So tokenomics can be deflationary once it reaches about 500 tps (if you're interested I can bring back the calculations).

from tonapi.

Hello,
I have found another data inconsistency. Please let me know if it is better to open a new issue.
Tonscan stake 518 M
TonTech stake 275.43
TonStat stake 489 M
Which one is correct? I suppose the value is calculated in different ways.
Thank you

from tonapi.

staking has two half-periods and full stake splited on two parts. also elector account has money which doesn't participate in staking. So calculating total amount can be difficult.
i think tonstat gave the most precious value.

from tonapi.

Thank you for the quick reply. I have no doubt how difficult it can be, however the various data aggregators should agree on the values. For example, tonscan calculates the total stakes of the validators of the current round and the frozen stakes of the validators of the previous round link. Why do you think your way is better?
Thank you

from tonapi.