rights information about collengine HOT 6 OPEN

Please add:
pbcoreRightsSummary_rightsSummary: Copyright Status (Public Domain - Copyrighted - Copyright status unknown) -- Required
pbcoreRightsSummary_rightsSummary: Copyright Statement (see boilerplate © statements) -- Required
pbcoreRightsSummary_rightsSummary: Copyright Holder -- Preferred
pbcoreRightsSummary_rightsSummary: Copyright Holder Info -- Preferred
pbcoreRightsSummary_rightsSummary: Copyright Date -- Preferred
pbcoreRightsSummary_rightsSummary Copyright Notice -- Ideal
pbcoreRightsSummary_rightsLink: URI if supplied by Library/Archive -- Ideal

from collengine.

These were the fields we had before

https://github.com/tingletech/collengine/blob/master/items/models.py#L197

how to handle the boilerplate is what has me stuck; but I was just going to put in fields for what it commented out in the models.py...

from collengine.

hi Brian,
I updated the field names so they relate to each instantiation (per pbcore v.2) and I liked the idea of a rights link. Can we change the fields in the model? I took copyright holder info out because this might be private information, and I don't see a point to holding onto non-public information when the current system exports all fields.

thank you
pamela

from collengine.

The names you use are not valid names (/'s and spaces) with respect to the models.py...

Why do you want to keep private information about rightsholders? Shouldn't you record who they are (but not phone # social etc.) and contact info for who to contact to clear further rights (which might be the phone of the rightsholder)

I have not looked at the new PBCore yet but tracking rights at the instantiation level seems like a major change -- right now in here it is at the leve of the work as a whole.

For this project and workflow, do you anticipate different rights for the different files?

Are there extant "rights links"?

While we don't use the schema at this URL, this is a source I take as authoritative as far as what rights information we want to collect and display in OAC/Calisphere so that end users can make an informed decision about further use of materials discovered on our site. http://www.cdlib.org/groups/rmg/ Adrian has an interpretation of this as a set of rights fields that is used for LHDRP project and I think we should try to stick to Adrian's fields if possible.

from collengine.

• can you use an underscore rather than a / for models names?
• we're recording the name of the rights holder but not their contact information. If someone wants to contact the rights holder to clear further rights, I think it's fine if they go through the institution. Originally I included Owner contact information, but I think for some items there might be privacy issues. Is there a way to repress this info so it doesn't export?
• I think rights information will be the same for the asset on an item level and on each file level. But I'd like to allow these fields either here or in another db like Collection Space, in case rights change.
• No rights links yet, we'll see if participants can supply them!
• I'm following LHDRP's (c) standards - all fields except for Copyright Holder Info

from collengine.

At this time, let's stick to Rights on an Asset-level (forget my rights per Instantiation idea). I'll save that idea for another day.

from collengine.