pass argv: string[] to main operation about effection HOT 4 CLOSED

Not sure I agree with this. E.g. if you're using yargs it will look at process.argv without having to pass it in.

We could totally do this, but it feels a bit unnecessary to me. Using process.argv is fine, imo.

from effection.

There are two isues: convenience and isolation. Right now, we're forcing a program to couple to a global context for argument processing. That'll always be an option, but also passing in the arguments as an argument in this way let's your operation be used in any context, for example a unit-testing context.

from effection.

@cowboyd given that main now also works in the browser, do you still feel we should do this, since there isn't really an equivalent to argv in the browser?

from effection.

@cowboyd given that main now also works in the browser, do you still feel we should do this, since there isn't really an equivalent to argv in the browser?

We could say [] in the browser, but I don't feel strongly about this. I say let's not do it now since it can be a forward compatible change if we decide to do it later, but it will not be a backwards compatible change if we decide we don't want it in the future

from effection.