stage.3 fails if no igw is deployed about deepsea HOT 4 CLOSED

Coul we just remove failhard or will that break other parts?

from deepsea.

I found this yesterday too. This is true for rgw and mds as well.

Removing the failhard is one part, but the select.minions runner should return an empty array. I'll experiment.

In the meantime, anybody hitting this can comment out the pieces on line 30 of deploy.sls. For example,
{#% for role in [ 'admin', 'mon', 'osd', 'igw', 'mds', 'rgw' ] %#}
{% for role in [ 'admin', 'mon', 'osd', 'mds' ] %}

For stage 4, simply call the service.
salt-run state.orch ceph.stage.cephfs.

from deepsea.

FWIW stage 4 ran ok for me. The rgw and igw targets failed but my mds was
deployed. Maybe that was just luck with the ordering though.

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 03:13:37AM -0700, Eric Jackson wrote:

I found this yesterday too. This is true for rgw and mds as well.

Removing the failhard is one part, but the select.minions runner should
return an empty array. I'll experiment.

In the meantime, anybody hitting this can comment out the pieces on
line 30 of deploy.sls. For example,
{#% for role in [ 'admin', 'mon', 'osd', 'igw', 'mds', 'rgw' ] %#}
{% for role in [ 'admin', 'mon', 'osd', 'mds' ] %}

For stage 4, simply call the service.
salt-run state.orch ceph.stage.cephfs.

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, [1]view it on GitHub, or [2]mute the
thread.

References

1. #13 (comment)
2. https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAb_BXTY0tXpXDerEE8QRxsQl8Jnk7vjks5quj3RgaJpZM4KIe7u

Jan Fajerski
Engineer Enterprise Storage
SUSE Linux GmbH
[email protected]

from deepsea.

I just pushed 0.5.1 to handle unassigned roles gracefully. I had to add test.nop to a few state files to avoid Jinja rendering empty files.

from deepsea.