XML Security Issue about beatbox HOT 7 CLOSED

Thanks for raising this, I looked at the pyforce PR, which seems straightforward enough but adds additional dependencies, something beatbox was trying to avoid. Typically the sax handler can disable this, i'll have a poke around.

from beatbox.

It is interesting that the external package defusexml is one of two safe alternatives recommended in Python docs about XML. I think that Salesforce is more trustworthy for its customers than any trustworthy external package, e.g. by hijackinging that additional site.

Internal ElementTree package would be safe against data leak. The remaining "billion laughs" or "quadratic blowup" DDoS attacks are improbable by a response from Salesforce. Salesforce has so many easier legal ways to directly refuse a service that a DDoS attack by XML is a nonsense.

from beatbox.

There are a few different things here:

If you're concerned with the extra attack surface of an external package getting updated with malicious code in the future then you can just lock it to ==0.5.0 -- I think that's the latest and I did read it all. (Or just inline the relevant code, although I don't remember if it has xmlsec etc. as a dependency.)

If you're concerned with PyPi getting hacked you should have internal mirrors and audit everything when you update.

When I say Salesforce I'm not talking about the brand name or company ethos, I have nothing against them [1], it's more that if they have a disgruntled employee or are compromised. If I was on their security team I wouldn't want this library being vulnerable, as it potentially makes things worse in the event of an incident.

Is potential RCE (by using sax) an acceptable risk, given the pretty low likelihood? No.

Is DoS (not DDoS), by using ElementTree, an acceptable risk, given the pretty low likelihood? I might say Yes, you say Yes, but do we want to decide for everyone using the library? I don't know, I fixed my fork with defusedxml and don't really know what to say.

[1] one small thing

from beatbox.

Sure thing, I'll have a look at whatever you come up with without defusedxml.

from beatbox.

ElementTree doesn't export make_parser though, and I've never seen anyone else use sax, so there is probably a legitimate reason why you can't replace it with ElementTree easily.

from beatbox.

Sax module in current Python versions >= 3.6.7, >= 3.7.1, >= 3.8.0 is safe against RCE attacks by xml (external entity expansion attack and DTD retrieval). In other words: all Python versions >= 3.6 with a security fix from October 2018 or later are safe.

The official end of life of Python 2.7 was on 1th January 2020. The end of life of 3.5 is on 13th September 2020.

If Salesforce is used as a storage of important private economic data then providing no data by Salesforce would an effective form of Denial of Service that can't be prevented. Providing invalid economic data by Salesforce (or someone who can falsify a TLS certificate of SFDC) would be even worse than a DoS.

from beatbox.

That's a great point about Python 2, I'm okay with closing this 👍

from beatbox.