Question about min/max size when creating physics space about libbulletjme HOT 14 CLOSED

The anticipated release is now available: https://github.com/stephengold/Libbulletjme/releases/tag/12.1.1

I'll be very interested in any feedback you have on the new double-precision accessors:

• PhysicsCollisionObject.getPhysicsLocationDp()
• PhysicsCollisionObject.getPhysicsRotationDp()
• PhysicsRigidBody.getAngularVelocityDp()
• PhysicsRigidBody.getLinearVelocityDp()
• PhysicsRigidBody.setAngularVelocityDp()
• PhysicsRigidBody.setLinearVelocityDp()
• PhysicsRigidBody.setPhysicsLocationDp()
• PhysicsRigidBody.setPhysicsRotationDp()

from libbulletjme.

Also, I'm not seeing debug drawer in this library, Is there alternative way to draw it?

from libbulletjme.

Thanks for reaching out to me. I'm always curious how my work is being reused.

The max/min coordinate values are ignored when using DBVT broadphase acceleration, so there shouldn't be any measurable performance impact. There's even a single-argument constructor for PhysicsSpace which you can use to avoid having to specify max/min coordinate values.

The library does not provide access to Bullet's debug drawer. That's because I mostly use the library with JMonkeyEngine, which has its own debug drawer. I'll add "debug drawer" to the "What's missing" list in the README.

from libbulletjme.

I see, I expected it to work with double precision but I don't see a way to do so, even though there's native libraries for double precision. Is there way to use double precision on java binding? All values in Transform is float, and It mostly, if not only, uses Vector3f

from libbulletjme.

The JNI interface is entirely single-precision. The "Dp" native libraries use double precision internally, but use the single-precision interface to communicate with Java.

from libbulletjme.

Adding double-precision methods to the library wouldn't be difficult. If you tell me which methods you think would be most useful, I'll start adding them. Along with Vec3d, Quatd, Matrix3d, and so on.

from libbulletjme.

Adding double-precision methods to the library wouldn't be difficult. If you tell me which methods you think would be most useful, I'll start adding them. Along with Vec3d, Quatd, Matrix3d, and so on.

I'd like to contribute on this project. As it seems that I'll need to work with mostly double.
I have not worked with JNI before, but I'll try

from libbulletjme.

I don't need contributed code. Just tell me which methods you would use, and I'll create double-precision versions of those methods.

from libbulletjme.

I don't need contributed code. Just tell me which methods you would use, and I'll create double-precision versions of those methods.

They are no actually methods. I need a way to set/get position and velocity of a rigid body in double precision. Currently it uses Matrix4f or Vector3f to interface with native library. I need it to use Matrix4d and Vector3d instead

from libbulletjme.

I'll add double-precision versions of

• getPhysicsLocation()
• setPhysicsLocation()
• getLinearVelocity() and
• setLinearVelocity()

in the next release.

from libbulletjme.

Thank you

from libbulletjme.

Thank you. I have one more question, I want to render physical object myself, as I'm using it with minecraft. How do I get world position of each vertices of a rigid body?

from libbulletjme.

If you created the body's collision shape using MeshCollisionShape or GImpactCollisionShape or HeightfieldCollisionShape, then your application knows the position of every vertex and triangle in the mesh.

In any event, you can use DebugShapeFactory.getDebugTriangles() to generate a triangle mesh that approximates a specified collision shape.

from libbulletjme.

Thank you

from libbulletjme.