SEC-4: Java 5 Annotations for Acegi Security about spring-security HOT 4 CLOSED

Jason Carreira said:

I would suggest not using “SecurityConfig” as the name of the annotation. Something like “Secured” would be more in line with the common naming for Annotations.

from spring-security.

Mark St.Godard said:

Ben,

I have checked in the initial implementation of the Java 5 Annotations support.
Includes SecurityAnnotationAttributes, @Secured annotation, junit tests, and a port
of the “samples/attributes” —> “samples/annotations” example.

I have also started updating the docbook docs, including example configuration and usage.

Next up need to update the Contacts filter sample application to use the @Secured
and @Transactional annotations.

Cheers,
Mark

from spring-security.

Ben Alex said:

Mark, what’s the latest on this? I thought you’d finished the sample app. Can this task be closed?

from spring-security.

Mark St.Godard said:

Hi Ben,

I have the @Secured annotation and configuration checked in with tests under “core-tiger”

Core:
net.sf.acegisecurity.annotation.Secured
net.sf.acegisecurity.annotation.SecurityAnnotationAttributes

http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net/multiproject/acegi-security-tiger/apidocs/index.html

Samples:

I also converted over the “Attributes” example to Java 5 "Annotations:

acegisecurity/samples/attributes (Commons Attributes version)
acegisecurity/samples/annotations (Java 5 Annotation version)

Contacts:
I also created an version of the “Contacts” sample application that uses Java 5 Annotations for Security and Transaction management.

acegisecurity/samples/contacts (original JDK 1.3+ versions)
acegisecurity/samples/contacts-tiger (Java 5 Annotations version)

The above sample app uses @Secured and @Transactional annotations.

Documentation:

I have also added documentation to the Reference Guide that outlines the usage and configuration
of the Java 5 Annotations version vs. Commons Attributes.

So, I think its relatively complete, junit tests, etc.. I have tested under Tomcat 4.x and 5.×.
Have a look and let me know.

Cheers,
Mark

from spring-security.