Java SDK proxy endpoint support fails on unexpected headers about java-client HOT 4 CLOSED

Hi Brendan,

Apologies that you're having these troubles! Our team will take a look and come back to you!

from java-client.

Hi Brendan,

We are doing some research. We were able to reproduce the problem, but on our side it is only a warning:

Feb 25, 2019 3:05:18 PM org.apache.http.client.protocol.ResponseProcessCookies processCookies
WARNING: Invalid cookie header: "Set-Cookie: AWSALB=<......>;Version=1;Comment=;Domain=localhost;Path=/;Max-Age=20;Expires=Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:05:12 GMT". Invalid 'expires' attribute: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:05:12 GMT

Our Client does not fail. That points to HttpClient library

We are working on a fix for that (Setting CookiesSpec for our client for Standard), but we are wondering why on your side causes a failure and not a warning. Do you have the lines that are before and/or after that log line?

Thanks!
PS: We are working on an RC version that we will share with you to see if it solves the problem

from java-client.

@SenhorCastor thanks for getting back so quickly! I'm going to close this issue since it looks to be invalid. After I reviewed what was happening - yes you are right it was only a warning, and there was an issue with configuration of the proxy. I was working in conjunction with the java split sdk and evaluating if I should use the proxy or wait for redis support. I had decided to wait on redis support for the java split sdk (or maybe if you guys accepted a PR?), so I put together both of these issues ( #69 ) as a collected update.
Sorry about the invalid issue - and again, thank you for helping out!

from java-client.

Hey Brendan!

Glad you got to the bottom of this. We are still going to release 3.0.6 with that warning today.

Regarding support for Redis. It is a project we are going to prioritize and tackle it, we don't have a timeline yet.

Besides that, my understanding was that your team decided to start using the JAVA SDK in Proxy Mode since you were experiencing some delays or timeouts. Correct me if I am wrong, but you experienced those timeouts with version 3.0.3. On version 3.0.4 we made some improvements and also fixed a race condition that we are confident it addresses those timeouts. I would recommend giving it a try to the lates sdk version 3.0.5 (soon to be 3.0.6)

Again glad that you got to the bottom of this!
If you have any questions let us know
Fer

from java-client.