Code Monkey home page Code Monkey logo

Comments (5)

ahxt avatar ahxt commented on September 24, 2024

Thank you for your question. Our method, as well as GNN, is probably infeasible for a graph without node features. However, an alternative approach for such a graph is to use pre-trained node embeddings as node features. In this case, our method would be feasible. (For node classification, the graph data typically includes node features, as far as I know.)

Thanks.

from mlpinit-for-gnns.

tongnie avatar tongnie commented on September 24, 2024

Thanks for your prompt reply! I've run experiments with missing node features and try to train the GNN to reconstruct these missing values. However, I found that GNN can perform well on this task, but without message passing, a pure MLP can not handle this. So in this case, the trained MLP could not serve as a good initialization for GNNs.

from mlpinit-for-gnns.

ahxt avatar ahxt commented on September 24, 2024

Thank you for your exploration and experimental findings. The experimental results make sense to me. Since the pure MLP depends solely on node features, the quality of node features dominates the performance of MLP. Thank you for sharing your results

from mlpinit-for-gnns.

tongnie avatar tongnie commented on September 24, 2024

Thanks for your sharings. There is one more question that still confuses me and I'd like to hear your advice. Does the performence of MLPInit depends on the downstream tasks? In your paper, you've found that the MLP and GNN could have the same feature space. Despite, I've found that their features could be different. In other words, if the task is to directly apply the extracted features of GNN to perform regression, without a sigmoid or softmax function, then the performance of pure MLP may be inferior since the output features are different from GNNs'. How does MLP serve as a good initialization for GNN in this case?

Look forward to your reply!

from mlpinit-for-gnns.

ahxt avatar ahxt commented on September 24, 2024

Thanks for your question. I would say that if you would like to apply the extracted features from a GNN to perform a downstream task, PeerMLP cannot be used in this case, as PeerMLP requires the input feature and hidden layers of the GNN to have the same dimension.

from mlpinit-for-gnns.

Related Issues (2)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.