versorted on list of tuples about natsort HOT 9 CLOSED

Yes, thanks for reporting this! I also discovered this bug recently, and unfortunately this is a miss on my part... the number_type parameter is not passed on to the natsort_key that is recursively called to sort the lists of lists. This will be fixed in the next release.

As a temporary workaround, you could try something like this:

from operator import itemgetter
versorted(your_list, key=itemgetter(1))

Sorry about the inconvenience.

from natsort.

Thanks for the solution! :)

from natsort.

No problem! I will leave this issue open until I make the commit that fixes this bug.

from natsort.

Hi Seth,

As an FYI, the fix you provided works when the the elements before the versioned values are the same but breaks down otherwise. Please see the example below:

>>> l = [('a', '1.10 '), ('a', '1.1 '), ('b', '1.1.2 '), ('a', '1.2 ')]
>>> versorted(l, key=itemgetter(1))
[('a', '1.1 '), ('b', '1.1.2 '), ('a', '1.2 '), ('a', '1.10 ')]

whereas the expected output would be:

[('a', '1.1 '), ('a', '1.2 '), ('a', '1.10 '), ('b', '1.1.2 ')]

Hope that helps!
Thanks!

from natsort.

Yes, I am aware of that. In the data set you initially gave, all the first elements were 'a' so it worked; I assumed that what you gave as an example was representative of your actual data. You will need to wait for the update to get the new data set to sort properly. I plan to release this within a week.

from natsort.

The official release is not yet completed, but you can check out the development branch to get the functionality you require (don't worry, it passes all unit tests). Specifically, the bug was fixed in commit eb08fe5.

from natsort.

Thanks! Will try it out.

from natsort.

This has been released now in version 3.4.0.

from natsort.

Hello from the future. versorted is now depreciated and natsorted should be preferred as it now handles versions correctly by default.

from natsort.